Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28441974›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Evaluating effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group psychological intervention using cognitive behavioural strategies for women with common mental disorders in conflict-affected rural Pakistan: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Anna Chiumento, Syed Usman Hamdani, Muhammad Naseem Khan, Katie Dawson, Richard A Bryant, Marit Sijbrandij, Huma Nazir, Parveen Akhtar, Aqsa Masood, Duolao Wang and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03359486 nacompletednot on this map

Pilot Feasibility Study of Focused Psychosocial Support to Improve the Psychosocial Well-being and Functioning of Adults Affected by Humanitarian Crisis in Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorge Washington UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled120ConditionsDepressionArmsGroup problem management plus, Enhanced treatment as usual
NCT03747055 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Group Focused Psychosocial Support to Improve the Psychosocial Well-being and Functioning of Adults Affected by Humanitarian Crisis in Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorge Washington UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled611ConditionsDepression, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Psychological DistressArmsGroup problem management plus, Enhanced treatment as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Anna ChiumentoUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Anna.Chiumento@liverpool.ac.uk.
Syed Usman HamdaniUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Muhammad Naseem KhanKhyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Katie DawsonUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Richard A BryantUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Marit SijbrandijVU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Huma NazirHuman Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Parveen AkhtarHuman Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Aqsa MasoodHuman Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Duolao WangLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Mark van OmmerenDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Atif RahmanUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Human Development Research Foundation · PKUniversity of Liverpool · GBUNSW Sydney · AUKhyber Medical University · PKLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of humanitarian disasters upon mental health is well recognised. The evidence for psychological interventions for mental health is mounting, but few interventions have been rigorously tested in humanitarian settings. To be sustainable in humanitarian settings interventions need to be short, simple, deliverable by nonspecialists under supervision, and adopt a transdiagnostic approach where an array of mental health outcomes are addressed simultaneously. These elements have been incorporated into the newly developed WHO Problem Management Plus (PM+) Group intervention. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the locally adapted PM+ Group intervention for women in Swat, Pakistan.

methodsThis PM+ Group trial is a two-arm, single-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in a community-based setting with women in rural Pakistan. PM+ is delivered in partnership with the Lady Health Worker (LHW) Programme which provides community-based health care to women in Pakistan. Thirty-four LHW clusters will be randomised in a 1:1 allocation ratio using a permuted-block randomisation method. Participants screened and found to meet the inclusion criteria will be allocated to either the PM+ intervention group (n = 306), or the control arm (n = 306). The manualised PM+ intervention involves five sessions, each lasting 3 h, and introduces four strategies applied by participants to problems that they are facing. It is delivered by local female facilitators with a minimum of 16 years of education who are provided with targeted training and supervision. The primary outcome is individual psychological distress, measured by levels of anxiety and depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 20 weeks after baseline. Secondary outcomes include major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, levels of social support, levels of functioning, and economic effectiveness. Intervention acceptability will be explored through an embedded qualitative study. DISCUSSION: The PM+ Group trial will provide important evidence on the effectiveness of an empirically supported psychological treatment delivered by nonspecialists in a humanitarian setting. If proven effective, the qualitative component will inform strategies for PM+ Group scale-up in health systems in other humanitarian settings.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, identifier: ACTRN12616000037404. Registered on 19 January 2016; WHO Protocol ID RPC705, v.4, 2 November 2015.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultArmed ConflictsClinical ProtocolsCognitive Behavioral TherapyCommunity Mental Health ServicesCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMental DisordersMiddle AgedPakistanPsychotherapy, GroupCluster randomised controlled trialCost effectivenessEffectivenessGroup interventionHumanitarianLow- and middle-income countriesMental health and psychosocial supportMixed-methods evaluationNonspecialist health workerWomen

Identifiers

PMID28441974
PMCPMC5405533
OpenAlexW2609064455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.