Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28441962›Full record

Trial reportAddiction science & clinical practice2017

Acceptability of a mobile health intervention to enhance HIV care coordination for patients with substance use disorders.

Ryan P Westergaard, Andrew Genz, Kristen Panico, Pamela J Surkan, Jeanne Keruly, Heidi E Hutton, Larry W Chang, Gregory D Kirk

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01941108 (Technology-Enhanced Peer Navigation to Improve IDUs' Engagement in HIV Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01941108 nacompletednot on this map

Technology-Enhanced Peer Navigation to Improve IDUs' Engagement in HIV Care: The mPeer2Peer Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2013 to 2015Enrolled39ConditionsHIV, Drug UseArmsPeer Navigation Arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryan P WestergaardDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. rpw@medicine.wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5701-4516
Andrew GenzDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kristen PanicoDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pamela J SurkanDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jeanne KerulyDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Heidi E HuttonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Larry W ChangDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gregory D KirkDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Barriers to Effective HIV Care for Injection Drug Users After Release from PrisonK23DA032306 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WESTERGAARD, RYAN PATRICK · 2012 to 2016
$975k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA032306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons living with HIV and substance use disorders face barriers to sustained engagement in medical care, leading to suboptimal antiretroviral treatment outcomes. Innovative mobile technology tools such as customizable smartphone applications have the potential to enhance existing care coordination programs, but have not been rigorously studied.

methodsWe developed and implemented a two-component intervention consisting of peer health navigation supported by a smartphone application conducting ecologic momentary assessment (EMA) of barriers to care and medication adherence. Patients with a history of antiretroviral treatment failure and substance use were recruited to participate in the 9-month pilot intervention. Three peer health navigators were trained to provide social and logistical support while participants re-engaged in HIV care. We assessed the acceptability of the intervention components using qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews conducted with study participants and peer navigators.

resultsOf 19 patients enrolled in the study, 17 participated for at least 2 months and 15 completed the entire 9-month study protocol. The acceptability of the peer navigation intervention was rated favorably by all participants interviewed, who felt that peer support was instrumental in helping them re-engage in HIV care. Participants also responded favorably to the smartphone application, but described its usefulness mostly as providing reminders to take medications and attend appointments, rather than as a facilitator of patient navigation.

conclusionsPeer health navigation and smartphone-based EMA are acceptable approaches to facilitating engagement in HIV care for drug using populations. Future studies to evaluate the efficacy of this approach for improving long-term retention in care and antiretroviral treatment outcomes are warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01941108; registered on September 4, 2013.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsFemaleHealth BehaviorHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMental DisordersMiddle AgedMotivationPatient NavigationPilot ProjectsReminder SystemsSocioeconomic FactorsAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID28441962
PMCPMC5405459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.