Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28441936›Full record

Trial reportBMC nephrology2017

Rationale and design of BISTRO: a randomized controlled trial to determine whether bioimpedance spectroscopy-guided fluid management maintains residual kidney function in incident haemodialysis patients.

Simon J Davies, Fergus J Caskey, David Coyle, Elizabeth Lindley, Jamie Macdonald, Sandip Mitra, Martin Wilkie, Andrew Davenport, Ken Farrington, Indranil Dasgupta and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Simon J DaviesInstitute for Applied Clinical Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK. simonj.davies55@gmail.com.
Fergus J CaskeyUK Renal Registry and School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
David CoyleNIHR Devices for Dignity, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Elizabeth LindleyNIHR Devices for Dignity, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Jamie MacdonaldSchool of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, North Wales, UK.
Sandip MitraNIHR Devices for Dignity, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Martin WilkieRenal Medicine, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Andrew DavenportRenal Medicine, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ken FarringtonRenal Medicine, East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Hertfordshire, UK.
Indranil DasguptaRenal Medicine, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Paula OrmandySchool of Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work and Social Science, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
Lazaros AndronisHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ivonne Solis-TrapalaInstitute for Applied Clinical Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Julius SimInstitute for Applied Clinical Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBKeele University · GBBangor University · GBEast and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust · GBHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/14/216/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreserved residual kidney function (RKF) and normal fluid status are associated with better patient outcomes in incident haemodialysis patients. The objective of this trial is to determine whether using bioimpedance technology in prescribing the optimal post-dialysis weight can reduce the rate of decline of RKF and potentially improve patient outcomes. METHODS/

design516 pateints commencing haemodialysis, aged >18 with RKF of > 3 ml/min/1.73 m DISCUSSION: This trial will establish the added value of undertaking BI measures to support clinical management of fluid status and establish the relationship between fluid status and preservation of residual kidney function in incident haemodialysis patients.

trial registrationISCCTN Number: 11342007 , completed 26/04/2016; NIHR Portfolio number: CPMS31766; Sponsor: Keele University.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyDielectric SpectroscopyFemaleFluid TherapyHumansKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRenal DialysisRenal InsufficiencyReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityBioimpedanceBody compostionFluid managementFluid statusHaemodialysisHealth economicsResidual kidney function

Identifiers

PMID28441936
PMCPMC5405466
OpenAlexW2609915837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.