ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017
Vision: Two Speeds in the Retina.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Enhance Perceptual Learning of Chinese Character Reading in Adults With Macular Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Trial
- High-Fidelity Backpropagation through Primate Foveal Cones.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- HIGH-FIDELITY BACKPROPAGATION THROUGH PRIMATE FOVEAL CONES.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- In Vivo Cone Photoreceptor Topography of the Human Foveola.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- The Rapid Synthesis of Integral Stimuli.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025Article
- Regional tuning of photoreceptor adaptation in the primate retina.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Visual cortex anodal transcranial direct current stimulation does not alter reading performance for Chinese presented character-by-character to normal peripheral vision in older adults.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Retinorecipient areas in the common marmoset (Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023Review
- Late Development of Early Visual Perception: No Topology-Priority in Peripheral Vision Until Age 10.Child development · 2021Article
- Optimized Signal Flow through Photoreceptors Supports the High-Acuity Vision of Primates.Neuron · 2020Article
- Response Latency Tuning by Retinal Circuits Modulates Signal Efficiency.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Characterization of Retinal Functionality at Different Eccentricities in a Diurnal Rodent.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The central (foveal) retina takes about 30 milliseconds longer to signal to the brain than the peripheral retina. In the natural world, a 30 millisecond delay could have real consequences. Why did evolution do it this way?
Indexed as
Identifiers
28441563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.