Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28441175›Full record

Trial reportAIDS (London, England)2017

Acceptability and use of a dapivirine vaginal ring in a phase III trial.

Elizabeth T Montgomery, Ariane van der Straten, Miria Chitukuta, Krishnaveni Reddy, Kubashni Woeber, Millicent Atujuna, Linda-Gail Bekker, Juliane Etima, Teopista Nakyanzi, Ashley J Mayo and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 93 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Elizabeth T MontgomeryaWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International bDepartment of Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA cUZ-UCSF Collaborative Research Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe dWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (WRHI), Johannesburg eHIV Prevention Research Unit, South Africa Medical Research Council, Durban fDesmond Tutu HIV Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa gMakerere University-Johns Hopkins University Research Unit, Kampala, Uganda hFHI360, Durham, North Carolina iNational Institute of Mental Health jDivision of AIDS, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland kUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ariane van der Straten
Miria Chitukuta
Krishnaveni Reddy
Kubashni Woeber
Millicent Atujuna
Linda-Gail Bekker
Juliane Etima
Teopista Nakyanzi
Ashley J Mayo
Ariana Katz
Nicole Laborde
Cynthia I Grossman
Lydia Soto-Torres
Thesla Palanee-Phillips
Jared M Baeten
MTN-020/ASPIRE Study
Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZAMUJHU Research Collaboration · UGPerinatal HIV Research Unit · ZAFamily Health International 360 · USOffice of AIDS Research · USSan Francisco AIDS Foundation · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco · ZW

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
Microbicide Trials NetworkU01AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2006 to 2010
$77.0M
University of North Carolina Global HIV Prevention and Treatment Clinical Trials Unit 2024 SupplementUM1AI069423 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph J Eron, MINA CHRISTINE HOSSEINIPOUR · 2012 to 2026
$71.8M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068615 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BROWN, ELIZABETH RENATA · 2011 to 2021
$66.5M
Wits HIV Research Group CLINICAL TRIAL UNIT (CTU) reapplicationUM1AI069463 · NIAID · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI REES, HELEN, SANNE, IAN MATTHIAS · 2012 to 2025
$31.8M
Laboratory Center (LC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI106707 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MELLORS, JOHN W, ROHAN, LISA CENCIA · 2014 to 2021
$27.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068615NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069423NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069463NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe MTN-020/ASPIRE trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the dapivirine vaginal ring for prevention of HIV-1 infection among African women. A nested qualitative component was conducted at six of 15 study sites in Uganda, Malawi, Zimbabwe and South Africa to evaluate acceptability of and adherence to the ring.

methodQualitative study participants (n = 214) were interviewed with one of three modalities: single in-depth interview, up to three serial interviews or an exit Focus Group Discussion. Using semistructured guides administered in local languages, 280 interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated, coded and analyzed.

resultsWe identified three key findings: first, despite initial fears about the ring's appearance and potential side effects, participants grew to like it and developed a sense of ownership of the ring once they had used it. Second, uptake and sustained adherence challenges were generally overcome with staff and peer support. Participants developed gradual familiarity with ring use through trial progression, and most reported that it was easy to use and integrate into their lives. Using the ring in ASPIRE was akin to joining a team and contributing to a broader, communal good. Third, the actual or perceived dynamics of participants' male partner relationship(s) were the most consistently described influence (which ranged from positive to negative) on participants' acceptability and use of the ring.

conclusionIt is critical that demonstration projects address challenges during the early adoption stages of ring diffusion to help achieve its potential public health impact as an effective, long-acting, female-initiated HIV prevention option addressing women's disproportionate HIV burden.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAfricaAnti-HIV AgentsChemopreventionContraceptive Devices, FemaleFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedPyrimidinesYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsDapivirinePyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID28441175
PMCPMC5557083
OpenAlexW2595391876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.