Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28440953›Full record

Trial reportCancer2017

Immunotherapy with single agent nivolumab for advanced leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: Results of a phase 2 study.

Eytan Ben-Ami, Constance M Barysauskas, Sarah Solomon, Kadija Tahlil, Rita Malley, Melissa Hohos, Kathleen Polson, Margaret Loucks, Mariano Severgnini, Tara Patel and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. A Phase 1/2 Trial Combining Avelumab and Trabectedin for Advanced Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Associations of PD-L1, PD-L2, and HLA class I expression with responses to immunotherapy in patients with advanced sarcoma: post hoc analysis of a phase 1/2 trial.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Correlative Analyses of the SARC028 Trial Reveal an Association Between Sarcoma-Associated Immune Infiltrate and Response to Pembrolizumab.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Eytan Ben-AmiCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9121-2399
Constance M BarysauskasDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sarah SolomonCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kadija TahlilCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rita MalleyCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Melissa HohosCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kathleen PolsonCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Margaret LoucksCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mariano SevergniniCenter for Immuno-oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tara PatelCenter for Immuno-oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Amy CunninghamCenter for Immuno-oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Scott J RodigCenter for Immuno-oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
F Stephen HodiCenter for Immuno-oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey A MorganCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Priscilla MerriamCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew J WagnerCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Geoffrey I ShapiroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Suzanne GeorgeCenter for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

VectorP30CA006516 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI A. Heather Eliassen · 1985 to 2026
$330.6M
XPO1 inhibitors Selinexor and Eltanexor in Combination with Venetoclax and Decitabine (ASTX727) in AMLUM1CA186709 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI KEITH T FLAHERTY, DONALD W. KUFE · 2014 to 2026
$25.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006516NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunotherapy has changed the therapeutic landscape in oncology. Advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) remains an incurable disease in most cases, and despite new drug approvals, improvements in overall survival have been modest at best. The goal of this study was to evaluate programmed-death 1 (PD-1) inhibition with nivolumab in this patient population.

methodsThis single-center phase 2 trial completed enrollment between May and October 2015. Patients received 3 mg/kg of intravenous nivolumab on day 1 of each 2-week cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. We assessed PD-1, PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and PD-L2 expression in archival tumor samples and variations in immune-phenotyping of circulating immune cells during treatment.

resultsTwelve patients were enrolled in the first stage of the 2-stage design. A median of 5 (range, 2-6) 2-week cycles of nivolumab were administered. Of the 12 patients, none responded to treatment. The overall median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval, 0.8-unknown). The study did not open the second stage due to lack of benefit as defined by the statistical plan. Archival samples were available for 83% of patients. PD-1 (>3% of cells), PD-L1, and PD-L2 (>5% and >10% of tumor cells, respectively) expression were observed in 20%, 20%, and 90% of samples, respectively. No significant differences were observed between pre- and posttreatment cell phenotypes.

conclusionSingle-agent nivolumab did not demonstrate a benefit in this cohort of previously treated advanced ULMS patients. Further biomarker-driven approaches and studies evaluating combined immune checkpoint-modulators should be considered. Cancer 2017;123:3285-90. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousKaplan-Meier EstimateLeiomyosarcomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedNivolumabanti-programmed-death 1 (PD-1)immunotherapynivolumabsarcomauterine leiomyosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID28440953
PMCPMC5762200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.