Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28440578›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017

Developing social marketed individual preconception care consultations: Which consumer preferences should it meet?

Sabine F van Voorst, Chantal A Ten Kate, Lieke C de Jong-Potjer, Eric A P Steegers, Semiha Denktaş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Developing social marketed individual preconception care consultations: Which consumer preferences should it meet?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sabine F van VoorstDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3827-2311
Chantal A Ten KateDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lieke C de Jong-PotjerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric A P SteegersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Semiha DenktaşDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University College, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPreconception care (PCC) is care that aims to improve the health of offspring by addressing risk factors in the pre-pregnancy period. Consultations are recognized as a method to promote perinatal health. However, prospective parents underutilize PCC services. Uptake can improve if delivery approaches satisfy consumer preferences. Aim of this study was to identify preferences of women (consumers) as a first step to social marketed individual PCC consultations.

methodsIn depth, semi-structured interviews were performed to identify women's views regarding the four components of the social marketing model: product (individual PCC consultation), place (setting), promotion (how women are made aware of the product) and price (costs). Participants were recruited from general practices and a midwife's practice. Content analysis was performed by systematic coding with NVIVO software.

resultsThe 39 participants reflected a multiethnic intermediately educated population. Product: Many participants had little knowledge of the need and the benefits of the product. Regarding the content of PCC, they wish to address fertility concerns and social aspects of parenthood. PCC was seen as an informing and coaching service with a predominant role for health-care professionals. PLACE: the general practitioner and midwife setting was the most mentioned setting. Promotion: A professional led promotion approach was preferred. Price: Introduction of a fee for PCC consultations will make people reconsider their need for a consultation and could exclude vulnerable patients from utilization.

conclusionThis study provides consumer orientated data to design a social marketed delivery approach for individual PCC consultations.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMarketing of Health ServicesPreconception CareProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchSocial MarketingSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adulthealth promotionperinatal healthpreconception carereproductive healthsocial marketing

Identifiers

PMID28440578
PMCPMC5600215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.