Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28440413›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2017

Different distributions of M1 and M2 macrophages in a mouse model of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.

Yedi Zhou, Shigeo Yoshida, Yuki Kubo, Takeru Yoshimura, Yoshiyuki Kobayashi, Takahito Nakama, Muneo Yamaguchi, Keijiro Ishikawa, Yuji Oshima, Tatsuro Ishibashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Macrophages and Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yedi ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812‑8582, Japan.
Shigeo YoshidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812‑8582, Japan.
Yuki KuboDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812‑8582, Japan.
Takeru YoshimuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812‑8582, Japan.
Yoshiyuki KobayashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812‑8582, Japan.
Takahito NakamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812‑8582, Japan.
Muneo YamaguchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812‑8582, Japan.
Keijiro IshikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812‑8582, Japan.
Yuji OshimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812‑8582, Japan.
Tatsuro IshibashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812‑8582, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a serious complication of age‑related macular degeneration. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression and distribution of M1 and M2 macrophages in a laser‑induced CNV adult mouse model. The mRNA expression levels of M1, M2 and pan macrophage markers, and macrophage‑associated angiogenic cytokines, were determined by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Immunofluorescence studies were performed to determine the location of the macrophages. The expression levels of M1 macrophage markers increased to a greater extent compared with M2 markers in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)‑choroid complexes following laser photocoagulation. By contrast, the expression levels of M2 macrophage markers increased primarily in the retinas. Immunofluorescence studies revealed that the increased number of cluster of differentiation (CD)206‑positive cells were located primarily in the retina, whereas the CD80‑positive cells were located around the site of CNVs in the RPE‑choroid. In addition, the M1‑associated cytokines increased to a greater extent in the RPE‑choroid complexes, whereas the M2‑associated cytokines were highly expressed in the retinas. These findings indicate that M1 and M2 macrophage numbers increased following CNV; however, the locations were different in this mouse model of laser‑induced CNV. The results of the present study suggest that M1 macrophages have a more direct role in inhibiting the development of CNV.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersChemotaxis, LeukocyteChoroidal NeovascularizationCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalGene ExpressionMacrophagesMacular DegenerationMaleMiceRetinaBiomarkersCytokines

Identifiers

PMID28440413
PMCPMC5436148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.