ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2017
Clinical profile and neuroimaging in pediatric optic neuritis in Indian population: A case series.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current landscape of pediatric optic neuritis management in India: A clinical practice survey.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Clinical features and visual outcome of pediatric optic neuritis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Characteristics of Optic Neuritis in South Korean Children and Adolescents: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Optic neuritis in German children: clinical findings and association with multiple sclerosis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020Observational
- Reply to Pediatric optic neuritis: Points to ponder.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Pediatric optic neuritis: Points to ponder!Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Visual Loss in Biotinidase Deficiency.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the studyThe purpose of this study was to report clinical features, neuroimaging, and visual outcome in pediatric optic neuritis (ON) in Indian population. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective study of children up to the age of 16 years, diagnosed with ON, that presented at pediatric and neuroophthalmology clinic of a tertiary eye care center, in South India, within the period of 2010-2015.
resultsWe identified 62 eyes of 40 children diagnosed as ON within the study period. The mean age was 11.15 ± 3.24 years (1-15 years) with mean follow-up of 13 months. In this series, there was female preponderance (67%). Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity at presentation was 1.14 ± 0.93, which after treatment recovered to 0.10 ± 0.26 at final visit (P < 0.001). Involvement was bilateral in 22 children (55%) and recurrent in 3 eyes of 3 children. Preceding febrile illness was reported in seven cases (18%). Four (10%) cases were diagnosed as multiple sclerosis (MS), one with neuromyelitis optica , and one with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. One case was associated with tuberculous meningitis, 1 with septicemia, and 1 with bilateral maxillary sinusitis. Neuroimaging studies of optic nerve in 14 children demonstrated isolated optic nerve enhancement. Magnetic resonance imaging brain revealed white matter T2 hyperintense lesions separate from optic nerve in ten cases, of which four cases were diagnosed as MS.
conclusionsBilateral presentation was common, association with MS was low. Papillitis was more frequent than retrobulbar neuritis and prognosis was good in pediatric ON in Indian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.