Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28440222›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Dual leucine zipper kinase-dependent PERK activation contributes to neuronal degeneration following insult.

Martin Larhammar, Sarah Huntwork-Rodriguez, Zhiyu Jiang, Hilda Solanoy, Arundhati Sengupta Ghosh, Bei Wang, Joshua S Kaminker, Kevin Huang, Jeffrey Eastham-Anderson, Michael Siu and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Protein kinases as therapeutic targets in Alzheimer's disease: challenges, insights, and new frontiers.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A lead role for a "secondary" axonal injury response.Neural regeneration research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin LarhammarDepartment of Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1547-6760
Sarah Huntwork-RodriguezDepartment of Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.
Zhiyu JiangDepartment of Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.
Hilda SolanoyDepartment of Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.
Arundhati Sengupta GhoshDepartment of Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.
Bei WangDepartment of Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.
Joshua S KaminkerBioinformatics, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.
Kevin HuangBioinformatics, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.
Jeffrey Eastham-AndersonPathology, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.
Michael SiuDiscovery Chemistry, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.
Zora ModrusanMolecular Biology, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.
Madeline M FarleyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Marc Tessier-LavigneDepartment of Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.
Joseph W LewcockDepartment of Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3012-7881
Trent A WatkinsDepartment of Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6723-3712
Baylor College of Medicine · USRockefeller University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) arm of the Integrated Stress Response (ISR) is implicated in neurodegenerative disease, although the regulators and consequences of PERK activation following neuronal injury are poorly understood. Here we show that PERK signaling is a component of the mouse MAP kinase neuronal stress response controlled by the Dual Leucine Zipper Kinase (DLK) and contributes to DLK-mediated neurodegeneration. We find that DLK-activating insults ranging from nerve injury to neurotrophin deprivation result in both c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) signaling and the PERK- and ISR-dependent upregulation of the Activating Transcription Factor 4 (ATF4). Disruption of PERK signaling delays neurodegeneration without reducing JNK signaling. Furthermore, DLK is both sufficient for PERK activation and necessary for engaging the ISR subsequent to JNK-mediated retrograde injury signaling. These findings identify DLK as a central regulator of not only JNK but also PERK stress signaling in neurons, with both pathways contributing to neurodegeneration.

Indexed as

Nerve DegenerationAnimalseIF-2 KinaseGene Expression RegulationMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceNeuronseIF-2 KinaseMAP Kinase Kinase Kinasesmitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 12apoptosisaxonal injurycell biologymouseneurodegenerationneuroscienceoptic nervestress responseunfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID28440222
PMCPMC5404924
OpenAlexW2606365238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.