Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28440074›Full record

ArticleOrganic letters2017

Applications of Synthetic Organic Tetrasulfides as H

Matthew M Cerda, Matthew D Hammers, Mary S Earp, Lev N Zakharov, Michael D Pluth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Organic letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Redox-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems: A Chemical Perspective.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Activatable Small-Molecule Hydrogen Sulfide Donors.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fluorogenic hydrogen sulfide (HChemical science · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew M CerdaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Materials Science Institute, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon , Eugene, Oregon 97403, United States.
Matthew D HammersDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Materials Science Institute, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon , Eugene, Oregon 97403, United States.
Mary S EarpDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Materials Science Institute, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon , Eugene, Oregon 97403, United States.
Lev N ZakharovDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Materials Science Institute, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon , Eugene, Oregon 97403, United States.
Michael D PluthDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Materials Science Institute, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon , Eugene, Oregon 97403, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3604-653X

Funding

Supplement to: Chemical Tools for Delivery and Detection of Biological Hydrogen SulfideR01GM113030 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PLUTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an effort to expand the availability of simple polysulfides for H

Identifiers

PMID28440074
PMCPMC6022400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.