Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28439843›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2017

Effective dose estimation for oncological and neurological PET/CT procedures.

Josep M Martí-Climent, Elena Prieto, Verónica Morán, Lidia Sancho, Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile, Javier Arbizu, María J García-Velloso, José A Richter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Optimizing Immuno-PET Imaging of Tumor PD-L1 Expression: Pharmacokinetic, Biodistribution, and Dosimetric Comparisons ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dynamic PET imaging with ultra-low-activity ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Josep M Martí-ClimentNuclear Medicine Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 36, Pío XII Avenue, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. jmmartic@unav.es.
Elena PrietoNuclear Medicine Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 36, Pío XII Avenue, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Verónica MoránNuclear Medicine Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 36, Pío XII Avenue, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Lidia SanchoNuclear Medicine Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 36, Pío XII Avenue, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Macarena Rodríguez-FraileNuclear Medicine Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 36, Pío XII Avenue, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Javier ArbizuNuclear Medicine Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 36, Pío XII Avenue, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
María J García-VellosoNuclear Medicine Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 36, Pío XII Avenue, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
José A RichterNuclear Medicine Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 36, Pío XII Avenue, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ESNavarre Institute of Health Research · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the patient effective dose (ED) for different PET/CT procedures performed with a variety of PET radiopharmaceutical compounds. PET/CT studies of 210 patients were reviewed including Torso (n = 123), Whole body (WB) (n = 36), Head and Neck Tumor (HNT) (n = 10), and Brain (n = 41) protocols with

resultsTotal ED (mean ± SD) for Torso-

conclusionsThe mean ED for body and brain PET/CT protocols with different radiopharmaceuticals ranged between 4.6 and 20.0 mSv. The major contributor to total ED for body protocols is CT, whereas for brain studies, it is the PET radiopharmaceutical.

Indexed as

BrainEffective dosePET/CTRadiopharmaceuticalWhole body

Identifiers

PMID28439843
PMCPMC5403773
OpenAlexW2607683059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.