ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2017
Searching for an Internal Representation of Stimulus Kinematics in the Response of Ventral Paraflocculus Purkinje Cells.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does the Cerebellum Implement or Select Geometries? A Speculative Note.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2020Article
- The Macaque Cerebellar Flocculus Outputs a Forward Model of Eye Movement.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019Article
- The caudal fastigial nucleus and the steering of saccades toward a moving visual target.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Motor control theories propose that the central nervous system builds internal representations of the motion of both our body and external objects. These representations, called forward models, are essential for accurate motor control. For instance, to produce a precise reaching movement to catch a flying ball, the central nervous system must build predictions of the current and future states of both the arm and the ball. Accumulating evidence suggests that the cerebellar cortex contains a forward model of an individual's body movement. However, little evidence is yet available to suggest that it also contains a forward model of the movement of external objects. We investigated whether Purkinje cell simple spike responses in an oculomotor region of the cerebellar cortex called the ventral paraflocculus contained information related to the kinematics of behaviorally relevant visual stimuli. We used a visuomotor task that obliges animals to track moving targets while keeping their eyes fixated on a stationary target to separate signals related to visual tracking from signals related to eye movement. We found that ventral paraflocculus Purkinje cells do not contain information related to the kinematics of behaviorally relevant visual stimuli; they only contain information related to eye movements. Our data stand in contrast with data obtained from cerebellar Crus I, wherein Purkinje cell discharge contains information related to moving visual stimuli. Together, these findings suggest specialization in the cerebellar cortex, with some areas participating in the computation of our movement kinematics and others computing the kinematics of behaviorally relevant stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.