Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28439778›Full record

ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2017

Dabigatran etexilate: appropriate use in patients with chronic kidney disease and in the elderly patients.

Mauro Molteni, Mario Bo, Giovanni Di Minno, Giuseppe Di Pasquale, Simonetta Genovesi, Danilo Toni, Paolo Verdecchia

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mauro MolteniInternal Medicine, Vimercate Hospital, Vimercate, MB, Italy. mauro.molteni@asst-vimercate.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0071-2900
Mario BoGeriatrics and Bone Metabolic Diseases Division, Città della Salute e della Scienza-Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Giovanni Di MinnoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe Di PasqualeCardiology Department, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Simonetta GenovesiNephrology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, MB, Italy.
Danilo ToniDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paolo VerdecchiaDepartment of Medicine, Hospital of Assisi, Assisi, PG, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera di Desio e Vimercate · ITFondazione Ricerca Molinette · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dabigatran etexilate (DE) is a direct thrombin inhibitor, which has been approved for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), and for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite large randomized clinical trials and independent observational studies providing robust data concerning DE safety and efficacy, some physicians still perceive mild-to-moderate renal impairment and old age as a relative contraindication to its use. In this article, we review the available scientific evidence supporting the use of DE in these clinical situations. Patients with AF and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are per se at high risk of stroke, bleeding and mortality. Although there is evidence of clinical benefit of anticoagulation in these patients, anticoagulant therapy requires caution and demands careful clinical monitoring, regardless of the drug used. In patients with no contraindication to its use, the clinical benefit of DE versus warfarin is independent of renal function. The elderly with AF are frequently undertreated because of the perception of high bleeding risk and limited clinical benefit. However, the clinical benefit of anticoagulation is independent of patient age, and age per se should not represent a contraindication to anticoagulation. DE has been extensively studied in the elderly, both in randomized clinical trials and in observational studies: DE 150 mg BID should not be used in patients 80 years of age or older, while DE 110 mg BID is as safe as warfarin. Intracranial haemorrhages reduction by DE compared with warfarin is preserved in the elderly. Therefore, mild and moderate CKD and being elderly should not deter physicians from prescribing DE. Furthermore, the availability of a specific antidote is expected to improve the safety of the use of DE in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAntithrombinsAtrial FibrillationDabigatranGeriatricsHemorrhageHumansMetabolic Clearance RateRenal Insufficiency, ChronicWarfarinAnticoagulantsAntithrombinsDabigatranWarfarinBleedingChronic kidney diseaseDabigatranElderly

Identifiers

PMID28439778
OpenAlexW2608444965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.