Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28439658›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2017

Pan-Genomic Approaches in Lactobacillus reuteri as a Porcine Probiotic: Investigation of Host Adaptation and Antipathogenic Activity.

Jun-Yeong Lee, Geon Goo Han, Jaeyun Choi, Gwi-Deuk Jin, Sang-Kee Kang, Byung Jo Chae, Eun Bae Kim, Yun-Jaie Choi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Impact ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. The probiotic and immunomodulation effects ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Probiotics, prebiotics, and COVID-19 infection: A review article.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jun-Yeong LeeDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Geon Goo HanDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaeyun ChoiDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gwi-Deuk JinDepartment of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Kee KangInstitute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea.
Byung Jo ChaeDepartment of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Eun Bae KimDepartment of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea. itanimal@kangwon.ac.kr.
Yun-Jaie ChoiDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. cyjcow@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

2016 Research Grant from Kangwon National University 520160476Strategic Initiative for Microbiomes in Agriculture and Food, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea 914005-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the introduction of a ban on the use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) for livestock, reuterin-producing Lactobacillus reuteri is getting attention as an alternative to AGPs. In this study, we investigated genetic features of L. reuteri associated with host specificity and antipathogenic effect. We isolated 104 L. reuteri strains from porcine feces, and 16 strains, composed of eight strains exhibiting the higher antipathogenic effect (group HS) and eight strains exhibiting the lower effect (group LS), were selected for genomic comparison. We generated draft genomes of the 16 isolates and investigated their pan-genome together with the 26 National Center for Biotechnology Information-registered genomes. L. reuteri genomes organized six clades with multi-locus sequence analysis, and the clade IV includes the 16 isolates. First, we identified six L. reuteri clade IV-specific genes including three hypothetical protein-coding genes. The three annotated genes encode transposases and cell surface proteins, indicating that these genes are the result of adaptation to the host gastrointestinal epithelia and that these host-specific traits were acquired by horizontal gene transfer. We also identified differences between groups HS and LS in the pdu-cbi-cob-hem gene cluster, which is essential for reuterin and cobalamin synthesis, and six genes specific to group HS are revealed. While the strains of group HS possessed all genes of this cluster, LS strains have lost many genes of the cluster. This study provides a deeper understanding of the relationship between probiotic properties and genomic features of L. reuteri.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialSus scrofaAnimalsFecesGenomicsLimosilactobacillus reuteriProbioticsHost specializationLactobacillus reuteriPan-genomeProbioticsReuterinSwine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.