Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28439590›Full record

ArticleChemical communications (Cambridge, England)2017

Competition-based, quantitative chemical proteomics in breast cancer cells identifies new target profiles for sulforaphane.

James A Clulow, Elisabeth M Storck, Thomas Lanyon-Hogg, Karunakaran A Kalesh, Lyn H Jones, Edward W Tate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Synthesis of Isothiocyanates Using DMT/NMM/TsOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James A ClulowDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UKSW7 2AZ. e.tate@imperial.ac.uk.
Elisabeth M StorckDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UKSW7 2AZ. e.tate@imperial.ac.uk.
Thomas Lanyon-HoggDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UKSW7 2AZ. e.tate@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7092-8096
Karunakaran A KaleshDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UKSW7 2AZ. e.tate@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-6093
Lyn H JonesMedicine Design, Pfizer, 610 Main Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8388-5865
Edward W TateDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UKSW7 2AZ. e.tate@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulforaphane is a small molecule isothiocyanate which exhibits anticancer potential, yet its biological targets remain poorly understood. Here we employ a competition-based chemical proteomics strategy to profile sulforaphane's targets and identify over 500 targets along with their relative affinities. These targets provide a new set of mediators for sulforaphane's bioactivity, and aid understanding of its complex mode of action.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAnticarcinogenic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleHumansIsothiocyanatesMCF-7 CellsMolecular StructureStructure-Activity RelationshipSulfoxidesAnticarcinogenic AgentsIsothiocyanatessulforaphaneSulfoxides

Identifiers

PMID28439590
PMCPMC6034444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.