ArticlePeerJ2017
Molecular assessment of the fecal microbiota in healthy cats and dogs before and during supplementation with fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) and inulin using high-throughput 454-pyrosequencing.
Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- A new highly digestible prescription diet containingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Trial
- Distilled Water Dilution Increases Measured Fecal pH in Fresh Canine Feces.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Evaluation of an Electronic Nose Coupled with In Vitro Fecal Fermentation as a Screening Tool for Fecal Odor in Cats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Dietary Fiber Regulation of Gut Microbiota and Bile Acid Metabolism in Animals: Implications for Animal Nutrition.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Effects of Chicken Protein Hydrolysate as a Protein Source to Partially Replace Chicken Meal on Gut Health, Gut Microbial Structure, and Metabolite Composition in Cats.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Food supplemented with a novel fiber blend containing soluble and insoluble fiber supported growth and fecal parameters indicative of gastrointestinal health in kittens.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Evaluation of enzymatically hydrolyzed poultry byproduct meal effects on fecal microbiota and pressure variables in elderly obese cats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Decoding the Gut Microbiome in Companion Animals: Impacts and Innovations.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Effects of a Nutraceutical Treatment on the Intestinal Microbiota of Sled Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- The Function of Probiotics and Prebiotics on Canine Intestinal Health and Their Evaluation Criteria.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Effects of Increasing Levels of Purified Beta-1,3/1,6-Glucans on the Fecal Microbiome, Digestibility, and Immunity Variables of Healthy Adult Dogs.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Prebiotic fiber blend supports growth and development and favorable digestive health in puppies.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Effects of Chenpi (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Gut microbiota in cats with inflammatory bowel disease and low-grade intestinal T-cell lymphoma.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Gut Microbiota Exchange in Domestic Animals and Rural-urban People Axis.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2024Review
- Validation of method for faecal sampling in cats and dogs for faecal microbiome analysis.BMC veterinary research · 2023Article
- Characterization and Description of the Fecal Microbiomes of Pet Domestic Ferrets (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Characterization of the Blood Microbiome and Comparison with the Fecal Microbiome in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Gastrointestinal Disease.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Influence of Coprophagic Behavior on the Digestibility of Dietary Nutrients and Fecal Fermentation Products in Adult Dogs.Veterinary sciences · 2022Article
- An Updated Review on Prebiotics: Insights on Potentials of Food Seeds Waste as Source of Potential Prebiotics.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prebiotics are selectively fermentable dietary compounds that result in changes in the composition and/or activity of the intestinal microbiota, thus conferring benefits upon host health. In veterinary medicine, commercially available products containing prebiotics have not been well studied with regard to the changes they trigger on the composition of the gut microbiota. This study evaluated the effect of a commercially available nutraceutical containing fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) and inulin on the fecal microbiota of healthy cats and dogs when administered for 16 days. Fecal samples were collected at two time points before and at two time points during prebiotic administration. Total genomic DNA was obtained from fecal samples and 454-pyrosequencing was used for 16S rRNA gene bacterial profiling. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) method was used for detecting bacterial taxa that may respond (i.e., increase or decrease in its relative abundance) to prebiotic administration. Prebiotic administration was associated with a good acceptance and no side effects (e.g., diarrhea) were reported by the owners. A low dose of prebiotics (50 mL total regardless of body weight with the end product containing 0.45% of prebiotics) revealed a lower abundance of Gammaproteobacteria and a higher abundance of Veillonellaceae during prebiotic administration in cats, while Staphylococcaceae showed a higher abundance during prebiotic administration in dogs. These differences were not sufficient to separate bacterial communities as shown by analysis of weighted UniFrac distance metrics. A predictive approach of the fecal bacterial metagenome using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) also did not reveal differences between the period before and during prebiotic administration. A second trial using a higher dose of prebiotics (3.2 mL/kg body weight with the end product containing 3.1% of prebiotics) was tested in dogs and revealed a lower abundance of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.