Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28439422›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials research2017

Anti-aging effect and gene expression profiling of dung beetle glycosaminoglycan in aged rats.

Mi Young Ahn, Ban Ji Kim, Ha Jeong Kim, Jae Sam Hwang, Yi-Sook Jung, Kun-Koo Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Toxicological research · 2021
    Article
  3. Glycosylation and Aging.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  4. Toxicity assessment ofToxicological research · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mi Young AhnDepartment of Agricultural Biology, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju-Gun, 55365 South Korea.
Ban Ji KimDepartment of Agricultural Biology, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju-Gun, 55365 South Korea.
Ha Jeong KimDepartment of Agricultural Biology, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju-Gun, 55365 South Korea.
Jae Sam HwangDepartment of Agricultural Biology, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju-Gun, 55365 South Korea.
Yi-Sook JungCollege of Pharmacy, Ajou University, Suwon, 442-749 South Korea.
Kun-Koo ParkPharmacogenechips Inc., Chuncheon, 200-160 South Korea.
Rural Development Administration · KRAjou University · KRNational Academy of Agricultural Science · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the anti-aging effect of a newly prepared insect-derived compound, dung beetle glycosaminoglycan (GAG), given intraperitoneally to old SD rats as part of their diet for 1 month. Insect GAG administration was found to be related to a reduction in oxidative damage, hepato-cellular biomarker levels, protein carbonyl content, and malondialdehyde concentration. The anti-aging-related molecular genetic mechanisms of dung beetle GAG are not yet fully elucidated.

results

conclusionOur data suggest that dung beetle glycosaminoglycan may be a helpful treatment for aged rats, which indicates its potential as a therapeutic biomaterial for aging.

Indexed as

Anti-aging effectDung beetle (Catharsius molossus)GlycosaminoglycanQueen of B. ignitus

Identifiers

PMID28439422
PMCPMC5399430
OpenAlexW2606460059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.