Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28439356›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2017

Impact of the 2003 ACGME Resident Duty Hour Reform on Hospital-Acquired Conditions: A National Retrospective Analysis.

Timothy Wen, Frank J Attenello, Steven Y Cen, Alexander A Khalessi, May Kim-Tenser, Nerses Sanossian, Steven L Giannotta, Arun P Amar, William J Mack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Physicians' working time restriction and its impact on patient safety: an integrative review.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Timothy Wen
Frank J Attenello
Steven Y Cen
Alexander A Khalessi
May Kim-Tenser
Nerses Sanossian
Steven L Giannotta
Arun P Amar
William J Mack

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education reforms in 2003 instituted an 80-hour weekly limit for resident physicians. Critics argue that these restrictions have increased handoffs among residents and the potential for a decline in patient safety. "Never events" hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) are a set of preventable events used as a quality metric in hospital safety analyses.

objectiveThis analysis evaluated post-work hour reform effects on HAC incidence for US hospital inpatients, using the National Inpatient Sample.

methodsData were collected from 2000-2002 (pre-2003) and 2004-2006 (post-2003) time periods. HAC incidence in academic and non-academic centers was evaluated in multivariate analysis assessing for likelihood of HAC occurrence, prolonged length of stay (pLOS), and increased total charges.

resultsThe data encompassed approximately 111 million pre-2003 and 117 million post-2003 admissions. Patients were 10% more likely to incur a HAC in the post-2003 versus pre-2003 era (odds ratio [OR] = 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.14;

conclusionsPost-2003 era patients were associated with 10% increased likelihood of HAC, with effects noted primarily at teaching hospitals.

Indexed as

AccreditationEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansInternship and ResidencyPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingPhysiciansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28439356
PMCPMC5398152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.