Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28439236›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2017

Auditory, Visual and Audiovisual Speech Processing Streams in Superior Temporal Sulcus.

Jonathan H Venezia, Kenneth I Vaden, Feng Rong, Dale Maddox, Kourosh Saberi, Gregory Hickok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Phonological Representations of Auditory and Visual Speech in the Occipito-temporal Cortex and Beyond.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neural circuit basis of pathological anxiety.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Benefit of visual speech information for word comprehension in post-stroke aphasia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Predictive Coding and Internal Error Correction in Speech Production.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Audiovisual speech perception: Moving beyond McGurk.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Increased Connectivity among Sensory and Motor Regions during Visual and Audiovisual Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan H VeneziaVA Loma Linda Healthcare SystemLoma Linda, CA, USA.
Kenneth I VadenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South CarolinaCharleston, SC, USA.
Feng RongDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and Engineering, University of CaliforniaIrvine, CA, USA.
Dale MaddoxDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and Engineering, University of CaliforniaIrvine, CA, USA.
Kourosh SaberiDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and Engineering, University of CaliforniaIrvine, CA, USA.
Gregory HickokDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and Engineering, University of CaliforniaIrvine, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human superior temporal sulcus (STS) is responsive to visual and auditory information, including sounds and facial cues during speech recognition. We investigated the functional organization of STS with respect to modality-specific and multimodal speech representations. Twenty younger adult participants were instructed to perform an oddball detection task and were presented with auditory, visual, and audiovisual speech stimuli, as well as auditory and visual nonspeech control stimuli in a block fMRI design. Consistent with a hypothesized anterior-posterior processing gradient in STS, auditory, visual and audiovisual stimuli produced the largest BOLD effects in anterior, posterior and middle STS (mSTS), respectively, based on whole-brain, linear mixed effects and principal component analyses. Notably, the mSTS exhibited preferential responses to multisensory stimulation, as well as speech compared to nonspeech. Within the mid-posterior and mSTS regions, response preferences changed gradually from visual, to multisensory, to auditory moving posterior to anterior.

Indexed as

audiovisual speechfMRIfunctional gradientsuperior temporal sulcusvisual motion

Identifiers

PMID28439236
PMCPMC5383672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.