Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28439223›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2017

Outer Hair Cell and Auditory Nerve Function in Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Background Noise.

Richard Hoben, Gifty Easow, Sofia Pevzner, Mark A Parker

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01781039 (Investigation of Anatomical Correlates of Speech Discrimination), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01781039 completednot on this map

Investigation of Anatomical Correlates of Speech Discrimination

TypeobservationalSponsorSteward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center of Boston, Inc.Ran2013 to 2019Enrolled186ConditionsSensorineural Hearing LossArmsHearing Aid fitting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inflection points in hearing deterioration: clinical characteristics of NIHL from steady-state noise exposure.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Hidden Hearing Loss: A Disorder with Multiple Etiologies and Mechanisms.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard HobenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical CenterBoston, MA, USA.
Gifty EasowDepartment of Otolaryngology, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical CenterBoston, MA, USA.
Sofia PevznerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical CenterBoston, MA, USA.
Mark A ParkerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical CenterBoston, MA, USA.
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to describe the contribution of outer hair cells (OHCs) and the auditory nerve (AN) to speech understanding in quiet and in the presence of background noise. Fifty-three human subjects with hearing ranging from normal to moderate sensorineural hearing loss were assayed for both speech in quiet (Word Recognition) and speech in noise (QuickSIN test) performance. Their scores were correlated with OHC function as assessed via distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and AN function as measured by amplitude, latency, and threshold of the VIIIth cranial nerve Compound Action Potential (CAP) recorded during electrocochleography (ECochG). Speech and ECochG stimuli were presented at equivalent sensation levels in order to control for the degree of hearing sensitivity across patients. The results indicated that (1) OHC dysfunction was evident in the lower range of normal audiometric thresholds, which demonstrates that OHC damage can produce "Hidden Hearing Loss," (2) AN dysfunction was evident beginning at mild levels of hearing loss, (3) when controlled for normal OHC function, persons exhibiting either high or low ECochG amplitudes exhibited no statistically significant differences in neither speech in quiet nor speech in noise performance, (4) speech in noise performance was correlated with OHC function, (5) hearing impaired subjects with OHC dysfunction exhibited better speech in quiet performance at or near threshold when stimuli were presented at equivalent sensation levels. These results show that OHC dysfunction contributes to hidden hearing loss, OHC function is required for optimum speech in noise performance, and those persons with sensorineural hearing loss exhibit better word discrimination in quiet at or near their audiometric thresholds than normal listeners.

Indexed as

auditory nervecompound action potential (CAP)distortion product otoacoustic emissionelectrocochleography (ECochG)hidden hearing lossouter hair cellQuickSINwave I auditory brainstem response (ABR)

Identifiers

PMID28439223
PMCPMC5383716
OpenAlexW2604051081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.