Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28439109›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2017

Efficacy and safety of carfilzomib regimens in multiple myeloma patients relapsing after autologous stem cell transplant: ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR outcomes.

P Hari, M-V Mateos, R Abonour, S Knop, W Bensinger, H Ludwig, K Song, R Hajek, P Moreau, D S Siegel and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01080391 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study Comparing Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Subjects With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2010 to 2017Enrolled792ConditionsRelapsed Multiple MyelomaArmsDexamethasone, Lenalidomide, Carfilzomib
NCT01568866 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib Plus Dexamethasone vs. Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2012 to 2018Enrolled929ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsCarfilzomib, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emerging agents and regimens for multiple myeloma.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

P HariMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
M-V MateosHematology, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Salamanca-IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain.
R AbonourIndiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
S KnopMedizinische Klinik der Universitat Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
W BensingerFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
H LudwigLeukemia/Bone Marrow Transplant Program of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
K SongUniversity Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
R HajekUniversity Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
P MoreauDepartment of Hematology, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
D S SiegelJohn Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
S FengAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
M ObrejaAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
S K AggarwalAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
K IskanderAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
H GoldschmidtUniversitatsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients, but many patients will relapse after ASCT and require subsequent therapy. The proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib is approved for relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). In phase 3 trials, carfilzomib-based regimens (ASPIRE, carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; ENDEAVOR, carfilzomib-dexamethasone) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with standard therapies for RRMM (ASPIRE: lenalidomide-dexamethasone; ENDEAVOR, bortezomib-dexamethasone). This subgroup analysis of ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR evaluated outcomes according to prior ASCT status. In total, 446 patients in ASPIRE and 538 in ENDEAVOR had prior ASCT. Median PFS was longer for carfilzomib-based regimens vs non-carfilzomib-based regimens for patients with prior ASCT (ASPIRE: 26.3 vs 17.8 months (hazard ratio (HR)=0.68); ENDEAVOR: not estimable vs 10.2 months (HR=0.61)), those with one prior line of therapy that included ASCT (ASPIRE: 29.7 vs 17.8 months (HR=0.70); ENDEAVOR: not estimable vs 11.2 months (HR=0.46)), and those without prior ASCT (ASPIRE: 26.4 vs 16.6 months (HR=0.76); ENDEAVOR: 17.7 vs 8.5 months (HR=0.43)). Overall response rates also favored the carfilzomib-based regimens. No new safety signals were detected. This analysis suggests that carfilzomib-based treatment may lead to improvement in PFS and response rates regardless of prior transplant status. Further evaluation is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaOligopeptidesPostoperative CareRecurrenceRetreatmentTransplantation, AutologouscarfilzomibOligopeptides

Identifiers

PMID28439109
PMCPMC5729352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.