Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28439034›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2017

Teleosts as Model Organisms To Understand Host-Microbe Interactions.

Emily A Lescak, Kathryn C Milligan-Myhre

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A novel gnotobiotic experimental system for Atlantic salmon (Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Recent Advances with Fish Microsporidia.Experientia supplementum (2012) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Threespine Stickleback: A Model System For Evolutionary Genomics.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily A LescakUniversity of Alaska Anchorage, Department of Biological Sciences, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6229-568X
Kathryn C Milligan-MyhreUniversity of Alaska Anchorage, Department of Biological Sciences, Anchorage, Alaska, USA kmillig1@alaska.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8479-0809
University of Alaska Anchorage · US

Funding

The Administrative CoreP20GM103395 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS · PI BRIAN M BARNES · 2012 to 2026
$66.1M
Determining the Role of the Host Genetic Background on Immune Response and Gut MicrobiotaR15GM122038 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE · PI MILLIGAN-MCCLELLAN, KATHRYN C.A. · 2017 to 2017
$427k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103395NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM122038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host-microbe interactions are influenced by complex host genetics and environment. Studies across animal taxa have aided our understanding of how intestinal microbiota influence vertebrate development, disease, and physiology. However, traditional mammalian studies can be limited by the use of isogenic strains, husbandry constraints that result in small sample sizes and limited statistical power, reliance on indirect characterization of gut microbial communities from fecal samples, and concerns of whether observations in artificial conditions are actually reflective of what occurs in the wild. Fish models are able to overcome many of these limitations. The extensive variation in the physiology, ecology, and natural history of fish enriches studies of the evolution and ecology of host-microbe interactions. They share physiological and immunological features common among vertebrates, including humans, and harbor complex gut microbiota, which allows identification of the mechanisms driving microbial community assembly. Their accelerated life cycles and large clutch sizes and the ease of sampling both internal and external microbial communities make them particularly well suited for robust statistical studies of microbial diversity. Gnotobiotic techniques, genetic manipulation of the microbiota and host, and transparent juveniles enable novel insights into mechanisms underlying development of the digestive tract and disease states. Many diseases involve a complex combination of genes which are difficult to manipulate in homogeneous model organisms. By taking advantage of the natural genetic variation found in wild fish populations, as well as of the availability of powerful genetic tools, future studies should be able to identify conserved genes and pathways that contribute to human genetic diseases characterized by dysbiosis.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsMicrobiotaAnimalsFishesModels, Animalanimal modelsfishgnotobiotichost-microbe interactionsmicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID28439034
PMCPMC5512220
OpenAlexW2608940385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.