ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
A New Prognostic Instrument Specifically Designed for Patients Irradiated for Recurrent Carcinoma of the Bladder.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Prognostic Tool for Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy plus Upfront Transurethral Resection for Bladder Cancer.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Predicting Survival After Whole-brain Irradiation for Cerebral Metastases in Patients with Cancer of the Bladder.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimTo develop an instrument that could estimate the 1-year survival probabilities of patients irradiated for recurrent carcinoma of the bladder. PATIENTS AND
methodsThirty patients irradiated for locally recurrent bladder carcinoma were included. Six pre-treatment factors [age, gender, Karnofsky score (KPS), pack years, grading and time between cancer diagnosis and radiotherapy] were evaluated for survival. Of those factors showing a trend or significance on multivariate analysis, 1-year survival rates were added.
resultsOn multivariate analysis, KPS was significant (hazard ratio(HR)=3.76, p=0.008), age showed a trend (HR=2.04, p=0.13). Patient scores were five, nine, ten or fourteen points with 1-year survival rates of 13%, 25%, 57% and 82% (p=0.003). Three groups were designed, A (5-9 points), B (10 points) and C (14 points) with 1-year survival rates of 17%, 57% and 82% (p=0.001).
conclusionThis score, including three groups with different 1-year survival probabilities, can aid physicians treating patients with recurrent bladder carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.