ReviewIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
The Use of Proteomics in Assisted Reproduction.
Review in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteostasis, Assisted Reproductive Technologies, and Neurodevelopmental Differences: An Integrative Perspective.Proteomes · 2026Review
- Fallopian tubes influences sperm selection and fertilization success.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An Overview of Advancements in Proteomic Approaches to Enhance Livestock Production and Aquaculture.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Follicular Fluid Proteomic Analysis of Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Suggests That Apolipoprotein A1 Is a Potential Fertility Marker.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- A Comparative Proteomic Analysis to Explore the Influencing Factors on Endometritis Using LC-MS/MS.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Reappraisal of evolving methods in non-invasive prenatal screening: Discovery, biology and clinical utility.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Sperm selection in IVF: the long and winding road from bench to bedside.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2020Review
- Quantitative proteomic characterization of human sperm cryopreservation: using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry.BMC urology · 2019Article
- Analysis of the equine "cumulome" reveals major metabolic aberrations after maturation in vitro.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Human blastocysts of normal and abnormal karyotypes display distinct transcriptome profiles.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the explosive increase in the use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) over the last 30 years, their success rates remain suboptimal. Proteomics is a rapidly-evolving technology-driven science that has already been widely applied in the exploration of human reproduction and fertility, providing useful insights into its physiology and leading to the identification of numerous proteins that may be potential biomarkers and/or treatment targets of a successful ART pregnancy. Here we present a brief overview of the techniques used in proteomic analyses and attempt a comprehensive presentation of recent data from mass spectrometry-based proteomic studies in humans, regarding all components of ARTs, including the male and female gamete, the derived zygote and embryo, the endometrium and, finally, the ART offspring both pre- and postnatally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.