Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28438764›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2017

Neurogenic hypertension and the secrets of respiration.

Benedito H Machado, Daniel B Zoccal, Davi J A Moraes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benedito H MachadoDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil; and bhmachad@fmrp.usp.br.
Daniel B ZoccalDepartment of Physiology and Pathology, School of Dentistry of Araraquara, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Davi J A MoraesDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil; and.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

CRCNS: Modeling the respiratory-sympathetic coupling in neurogenic hypertensionR01AT008632 · NCCIH · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOLKOV, YAROSLAV · 2015 to 2019
$1.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT008632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in the knowledge of the neural control of cardiovascular function, the cause of sympathetic overactivity in neurogenic hypertension remains unknown. Studies from our laboratory point out that rats submitted to chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH), an experimental model of neurogenic hypertension, present changes in the central respiratory network that impact the pattern of sympathetic discharge and the levels of arterial pressure. In addition to the fine coordination of respiratory muscle contraction and relaxation, which is essential for O

Indexed as

Arterial PressureRespirationAnimalsCardiovascular SystemDisease Models, AnimalHumansHypertensionHypoxiaLungModels, CardiovascularNeural PathwaysRespiratory CenterSympathetic Nervous Systemautonomic and respiratory networksneurogenic hypertensionpresympathetic neuronsrespiratory neuronssympathetic overactivity

Identifiers

PMID28438764
PMCPMC6148211
OpenAlexW2608338557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.