Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28438707›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2017

Contributions of the parietal cortex to increased efficiency of planning-based action selection.

Jennifer Randerath, Kenneth F Valyear, Benjamin A Philip, Scott H Frey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Are metaphors embodied? The neural evidence.Psychological research · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jennifer RanderathDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany; Lurija Institute, Kliniken Schmieder, Germany. Electronic address: J_Randerath@hotmail.com.
Kenneth F ValyearDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, USA; School of Psychology, Bangor University, UK.
Benjamin A PhilipDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, USA; School of Medicine, Washington University Saint Louis, USA.
Scott H FreyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, USA; Brain Imaging Center, University of Missouri, USA.
University of Missouri · USImaging Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

The Neural Organization of Tool Use Actions in HumansR01NS053962 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI FREY, SCOTT H · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
Is Cortical Reorganization Following Limb Amputation Functionally Relevant and Reversible?R01NS083377 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FREY, SCOTT H · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS053962NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response selection is foundational to adaptive behavior, and considerable attention has been devoted to investigating this behavior under conditions in which the mapping between stimuli and responses is fixed. Results from prior studies implicate the left supramarginal gyrus (SMg), premotor and prefrontal cortices, as well as the cerebellum in this essential function. Yet, many goal-directed motor behaviors have multiple solutions with flexible mappings between stimuli and responses whose solutions are believed to involve prospective planning. Studies of selection under conditions of flexible mappings also reveal involvement of the left SMg, as well as bilateral premotor, superior parietal cortex (SPL) and pre-supplementary motor (pre-SMA) cortices, along with the cerebellum. This evidence is, however, limited by exclusive reliance on tasks that involve selection in the absence of overt action execution and without complete control of possible confounding effects related to differences in stimulus and response processing demands. Here, we address this limitation through use of a novel fMRI repetition suppression (FMRI-RS) paradigm. In our prime-probe design, participants select and overtly pantomime manual object rotation actions when the relationship between stimuli and responses is either flexible (experimental condition) or fixed (control condition). When trials were repeated in prime-probe pairs of the experimental condition, we detected improvements in performance accompanied by a significant suppression of blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) responses in: left SMg extending into and along the length of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), right IPS, bilateral caudal superior parietal lobule (cSPL), dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC), pre-SMA, and in the lateral cerebellum. Further, region-of-interest analyses revealed interaction effects of fMRI-RS in the experimental versus control condition within left SMg and cerebellum, as well as in bilateral caudal SPL. These efficiency effects cannot be attributed to the repetition of stimulus or response processing, but instead are planning-specific and generally consistent with earlier findings from conventional fMRI investigations. We conclude that repetition-related increases in the efficiency of planning-based selection appears to be associated with parieto-cerebellar networks.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceAttentionBrain MappingDecision MakingFemaleHand StrengthHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOxygenParietal LobePhotic StimulationOxygenAction selectionfMRI repetition suppression

Identifiers

PMID28438707
PMCPMC5651213
OpenAlexW2605633136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.