ArticleJournal of microbiological methods2017
Diagnostic microarray for 14 water and foodborne pathogens using a flatbed scanner.
Article in Journal of microbiological methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elastic Light Scatter Pattern Analysis for the Expedited Detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Disposable microfluidic micromixers for effective capture ofJournal of biological engineering · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Parallel detection approaches are of interest to many researchers interested in identifying multiple water and foodborne pathogens simultaneously. Availability and cost-effectiveness are two key factors determining the usefulness of such approaches for laboratories with limited resources. In this study, we developed and validated a high-density microarray for simultaneous screening of 14 bacterial pathogens using an approach that employs gold labeling with silver enhancement (GLS) protocol. In total, 8887 probes (50-mer) were designed using an in-house database of virulence and marker genes (VMGs), and synthesized in quadruplicate on glass slides using an in-situ synthesis technology. Target VMG amplicons were obtained using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), labeled with biotin, and hybridized to the microarray. The signals generated after gold deposition and silver enhancement, were quantified using a flatbed scanner having 2-μm resolution. Data analysis indicated that reliable presence/absence calls could be made, if: i) over four probes were used per gene, ii) the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) cutoff was greater than or equal to two, and iii) the positive fraction (PF), i.e., number of probes with SNR≥2 for a given VMG was greater than 0.75. Hybridization of the array with blind samples resulted in 100% correct calls, and no false positive. Because amplicons were obtained by multiplex PCR, sensitivity of this method is similar to PCR. This assay is an inexpensive and reliable technique for high throughput screening of multiple pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.