Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28438387›Full record

ReviewTrends in biochemical sciences2017

Structural Insights into the Mechanism of Group II Intron Splicing.

Chen Zhao, Anna Marie Pyle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in biochemical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ACS chemical biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Editorial: RNA machines.Frontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CAF Proteins Help SOT1 Regulate the Stability of ChloroplastInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chen ZhaoDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Anna Marie PyleDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA. Electronic address: anna.pyle@yale.edu.

Funding

STUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF GROUP II INTRONSR01GM050313 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PYLE, ANNA MARIE · 1994 to 2016
$4.6M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the major architectural features and active-site components of group II introns have been known for almost a decade, information on the individual stages of splicing has been lacking. Recent advances in crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have provided major new insights into the structure of intact lariat introns. Conformational changes that mediate the steps of splicing and retrotransposition are being elucidated, revealing the dynamic, highly coordinated motions that are required for group II intron activity. Finally, these ribozymes can now be viewed in their larger, more natural context as components of holoenzymes that include encoded maturase proteins. These studies expand our understanding of group II intron structural diversity and evolution, while setting the stage for rigorous mechanistic analysis of RNA splicing machines.

Indexed as

Catalytic DomainCryoelectron MicroscopyIntronsProtein ConformationRNA, CatalyticRNA SplicingRNA, CatalyticGroup II intronmaturaseretrotranspositionribozymeRNA structurespliceosome

Identifiers

PMID28438387
PMCPMC5492998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.