Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28438296›Full record

ArticleOral oncology2017

Discussing HPV with oropharyngeal cancer patients: A cross-sectional survey of attitudes in health professionals.

Rachael H Dodd, Alice S Forster, Jo Waller, Laura A V Marlow

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachael H DoddCancer Communication & Screening Group, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, WC1E6BT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: r.dodd@ucl.ac.uk.
Alice S ForsterCancer Communication & Screening Group, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, WC1E6BT, United Kingdom.
Jo WallerCancer Communication & Screening Group, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, WC1E6BT, United Kingdom.
Laura A V MarlowCancer Communication & Screening Group, Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, WC1E6BT, United Kingdom.
Cancer Research UK · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17429Cancer Research UK C49896/A17429Cancer Research UK C7492/A17219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is now known to cause a significant proportion of head and neck cancers (HNC). Qualitative research has shown that some health professionals find it difficult to discuss HPV with patients due to its sexually transmitted nature, and have concerns about their own knowledge of the virus. We used a survey to quantify attitudes towards discussing HPV among HNC health professionals.

methodsWe carried out a cross-sectional survey of HNC health professionals (n=260) in the UK and Ireland, assessing participants' knowledge of HPV, their experiences of and attitudes towards discussing HPV with patients, and their willingness to discuss HPV with their patients in the future.

resultsOverall, health professionals had good knowledge of HPV (mean score: 9.97 out of 12). Oncologists had significantly greater knowledge than specialist nurses, speech and language therapists and 'other' health professionals. Most were willing to discuss HPV with patients (mean=4.3 out of 5). Willingness to discuss HPV in the future was associated with higher HPV knowledge (r=0.35, p<0.001), fewer negative and more positive attitudes towards discussing HPV (r=-0.23 and r=0.20 respectively, both p<0.001), fewer personal barriers (r=-0.49, p<0.001) and greater confidence (r=0.58, p<0.001).

conclusionKnowledge, experiences and attitudes to discussing HPV varied across HNC health professionals. Addressing gaps in health professionals' HPV knowledge and improving their confidence in discussing HPV with patients may increase their willingness to have such conversations. This may help minimise the negative psychosocial consequences of an HPV diagnosis in this patient group.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedAlphapapillomavirusCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOropharyngeal NeoplasmsTumor Virus InfectionsYoung AdultAttitudesHead and neck cancerHealth professionalsHuman papillomavirusKnowledge

Identifiers

PMID28438296
PMCPMC5414413
OpenAlexW2603357842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.