Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28438220›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2017

Anaplasma spp. in dogs and owners in north-western Morocco.

Sarah Elhamiani Khatat, Sylvie Daminet, Malika Kachani, Christian M Leutenegger, Luc Duchateau, Hamid El Amri, Mony Hing, Rahma Azrib, Hamid Sahibi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Serological Analysis of IgG and IgM Antibodies againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  15. Microorganisms · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sarah Elhamiani KhatatInstitut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat, Morocco. elhamianis@yahoo.fr.
Sylvie DaminetFaculty of Veterinary Medicine of Ghent University, Ghent, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Malika KachaniCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA.
Christian M LeuteneggerMolecular Diagnostics IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. West Sacramento, Sacramento, CA, 95605, USA.
Luc DuchateauFaculty of Veterinary Medicine of Ghent University, Ghent, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Hamid El AmriLaboratory of the Royal Gendarmerie, Rabat, Morocco.
Mony HingNational Reference Laboratory for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Laboratory of Clinical Biology, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Rahma AzribInstitut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat, Morocco.
Hamid SahibiInstitut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat, Morocco.
Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II · MAGhent University · BEIDEXX Laboratories (United States) · USLaboratoire de Recherche et d’Analyses Médicales de la Fraternelle de la Gendarmerie Royale · MAQueen Astrid Military Hospital · BEWestern University of Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnaplasma phagocytophilum is an emerging tick-borne zoonotic pathogen of increased interest worldwide which has been detected in northern Africa. Anaplasma platys is also present in this region and could possibly have a zoonotic potential. However, only one recent article reports on the human esposure to A. phagocytophilum in Morocco and no data are available on canine exposure to both bacteria. Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional epidemiological study aiming to assess both canine and human exposure to Anaplasma spp. in Morocco. A total of 425 dogs (95 urban, 160 rural and 175 working dogs) and 11 dog owners were sampled from four cities of Morocco. Canine blood samples were screened for Anaplasma spp. antibodies by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and for A. phagocytophilum and A. platys DNA by a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) targeting the msp2 gene. Human sera were tested for specific A. phagocytophilum immunoglobulin G (IgG) using a commercial immunofluorescence assay (IFA) kit.

resultsAnaplasma spp. antibodies and A. platys DNA were detected in 21.9 and 7.5% of the dogs, respectively. Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA was not amplified. Anaplasma platys DNA was significantly more frequently amplified for working dogs. No statistically significant differences in the prevalence of Anaplasma spp. antibodies or A. platys DNA detection were observed between sexes, age classes or in relation to exposure to ticks. A total of 348 Rhipicephalus sanguineus (sensu lato) ticks were removed from 35 urban and working dogs. The majority of dog owners (7/10) were seroreactive to A. phagoyctophilum IgG (one sample was excluded because of hemolysis).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the occurrence of Anaplasma spp. exposure and A. platys infection in dogs, and A. phagocytophilum exposure in humans in Morocco.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnaplasmaAnaplasmosisAnimalsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleHumansIxodidaeMaleMiddle AgedMoroccoOwnershipYoung AdultZoonosesAnaplasma phagocytophilumAnaplasma platysDogsHumansMoroccoPCRRhipicephalus sanguineusSerology

Identifiers

PMID28438220
PMCPMC5404288
OpenAlexW2608042698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.