ArticleMicrobiome2017
A powerful microbiome-based association test and a microbial taxa discovery framework for comprehensive association mapping.
Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phylogenetic association analysis with conditional rank correlation.Biometrika · 2024Article
- MiMultiCat: A Unified Cloud Platform for the Analysis of Microbiome Data with Multi-Categorical Responses.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A microbial causal mediation analytic tool for health disparity and applications in body mass index.Microbiome · 2023Article
- MKMR: a multi-kernel machine regression model to predict health outcomes using human microbiome data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Potential of Gut Microbe-Derived Extracellular Vesicles to Differentiate Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients from Healthy Controls.Gut and liver · 2023Article
- A microbial causal mediation analytic tool for health disparity and applications in body mass index.Research square · 2023Article
- The Lung Allograft Microbiome Associates with Pepsin, Inflammation, and Primary Graft Dysfunction.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022Article
- Microbial risk score for capturing microbial characteristics, integrating multi-omics data, and predicting disease risk.Microbiome · 2022Article
- Microbial Risk Score for Capturing Microbial Characteristics, Integrating Multi-omics Data, and Predicting Disease Risk.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2022Article
- Phylogeny-guided microbiome OTU-specific association test (POST).Microbiome · 2022Article
- Adaptive and powerful microbiome multivariate association analysis via feature selection.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Testing microbiome association using integrated quantile regression models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Postnatal growth and gut microbiota development influenced early childhood growth in preterm infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- An Adaptive and Robust Test for Microbial Community Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Beta-diversity distance matrices for microbiome sample size and power calculations - How to obtain good estimates.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- CombiningFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Kernel principal components based cascade forest towards disease identification with human microbiota.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Microbial trend analysis for common dynamic trend, group comparison, and classification in longitudinal microbiome study.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Variant-set association test for generalized linear mixed model.Genetic epidemiology · 2021Article
- Meta-analysis methods for multiple related markers: Applications to microbiome studies with the results on multiple α-diversity indices.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe role of the microbiota in human health and disease has been increasingly studied, gathering momentum through the use of high-throughput technologies. Further identification of the roles of specific microbes is necessary to better understand the mechanisms involved in diseases related to microbiome perturbations.
methodsHere, we introduce a new microbiome-based group association testing method, optimal microbiome-based association test (OMiAT). OMiAT is a data-driven testing method which takes an optimal test throughout different tests from the sum of powered score tests (SPU) and microbiome regression-based kernel association test (MiRKAT). We illustrate that OMiAT efficiently discovers significant association signals arising from varying microbial abundances and different relative contributions from microbial abundance and phylogenetic information. We also propose a way to apply it to fine-mapping of diverse upper-level taxa at different taxonomic ranks (e.g., phylum, class, order, family, and genus), as well as the entire microbial community, within a newly introduced microbial taxa discovery framework, microbiome comprehensive association mapping (MiCAM).
resultsOur extensive simulations demonstrate that OMiAT is highly robust and powerful compared with other existing methods, while correctly controlling type I error rates. Our real data analyses also confirm that MiCAM is especially efficient for the assessment of upper-level taxa by integrating OMiAT as a group analytic method.
conclusionsOMiAT is attractive in practice due to the high complexity of microbiome data and the unknown true nature of the state. MiCAM also provides a hierarchical association map for numerous microbial taxa and can also be used as a guideline for further investigation on the roles of discovered taxa in human health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.