ReviewBiointerphases2017
Biomedical surface analysis: Evolution and future directions (Review).
Review in Biointerphases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- ToF-SIMS analysis of ultrathin films and their fragmentation patterns.Journal of vacuum science & technology. A, Vacuum, surfaces, and films : an official journal of the American Vacuum Society · 2024Article
- Quantitative evaluation of perfluorinated alkanethiol molecular order on gold surfaces.Biointerphases · 2023Article
- Nanoclay-Doped Electrospun Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering: Investigation on the Structural Modifications in Physiological Environment.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Article
- XPS and ToF-SIMS Characterization of New Biodegradable Poly(Peptide-Urethane-Urea) Block Copolymers.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Recapitulating dynamic ECM ligand presentation at biomaterial interfaces: Molecular strategies and biomedical prospects.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2022Review
- Surface Modification of Bacterial Cellulose for Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Developments and Ongoing Challenges for Analysis of Surface-Bound Proteins.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2021Article
- Evaluation of surface layer stability of surface-modified polyester biomaterials.Biointerphases · 2020Article
- Polymer Surface Analysis: The Leadership and Contributions of David Briggs.Surface and interface analysis : SIA · 2020Article
- Using a lactadherin-immobilized silicon surface for capturing and monitoring plasma microvesicles as a foundation for diagnostic device development.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Multivalent ions and biomolecules: Attempting a comprehensive perspective.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2020Review
- Enhanced protein adsorption upon bulk phase separation.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Surface analysis tools for characterizing biological materials.Chemical Society reviews · 2020Review
- Characterizing protein G B1 orientation and its effect on immunoglobulin G antibody binding using XPS, ToF-SIMS, and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring.Biointerphases · 2020Article
- Biological explorations with nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry.Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry · 2019Article
- Structure of von Willebrand factor A1 on polystyrene determined from experimental and calculated sum frequency generation spectra.Biointerphases · 2018Article
- Surface-grafted antimicrobial drugs: Possible misinterpretation of mechanism of action.Biointerphases · 2018Article
- Surface Analysis: From Single Crystals to Biomaterials.Surface and interface analysis : SIA · 2018Article
- Proliferation of Osteoblasts on Laser-Modified Nanostructured Titanium Surfaces.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This review describes some of the major advances made in biomedical surface analysis over the past 30-40 years. Starting from a single technique analysis of homogeneous surfaces, it has been developed into a complementary, multitechnique approach for obtaining detailed, comprehensive information about a wide range of surfaces and interfaces of interest to the biomedical community. Significant advances have been made in each surface analysis technique, as well as how the techniques are combined to provide detailed information about biological surfaces and interfaces. The driving force for these advances has been that the surface of a biomaterial is the interface between the biological environment and the biomaterial, and so, the state-of-the-art in instrumentation, experimental protocols, and data analysis methods need to be developed so that the detailed surface structure and composition of biomedical devices can be determined and related to their biological performance. Examples of these advances, as well as areas for future developments, are described for immobilized proteins, complex biomedical surfaces, nanoparticles, and 2D/3D imaging of biological materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.