ArticleOptics express2017
Model and reconstruction of a K-edge contrast agent distribution with an X-ray photon-counting detector.
Article in Optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Stain Mapping in X-Ray Virtual Histology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Photon-counting computed tomography in radiology.Polish journal of radiology · 2024Review
- An introduction to photon-counting detector CT (PCD CT) for radiologists.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Contrast-Enhanced CT-Based Radiomics Analysis in Predicting Lymphovascular Invasion in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Nanophosphor-Based Contrast Agents for Spectral X-ray Imaging.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) helps enhance the visibility for tumor imaging. When a high-Z contrast agent interacts with X-rays across its K-edge, X-ray photoelectric absorption would experience a sudden increment, resulting in a significant difference of the X-ray transmission intensity between the left and right energy windows of the K-edge. Using photon-counting detectors, the X-ray intensity data in the left and right windows of the K-edge can be measured simultaneously. The differential information of the two kinds of intensity data reflects the contrast-agent concentration distribution. K-edge differences between various matters allow opportunities for the identification of contrast agents in biomedical applications. In this paper, a general radon transform is established to link the contrast-agent concentration to X-ray intensity measurement data. An iterative algorithm is proposed to reconstruct a contrast-agent distribution and tissue attenuation background simultaneously. Comprehensive numerical simulations are performed to demonstrate the merits of the proposed method over the existing K-edge imaging methods. Our results show that the proposed method accurately quantifies a distribution of a contrast agent, optimizing the contrast-to-noise ratio at a high dose efficiency.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.