Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28437848›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2018

Inferring network structure in non-normal and mixed discrete-continuous genomic data.

Anindya Bhadra, Arvind Rao, Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications.Statistical methods & applications · 2022
    Review
  4. Bayesian Variable Selection for Gaussian copula regression models.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anindya BhadraDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, 250 N. University Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-0636-5273
Arvind RaoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Dr., Houston, Texas 77030, U.S.A.
Veerabhadran BaladandayuthapaniDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Dr., Houston,Texas 77030, U.S.A.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Graph-based Bayesian analysis of Genomics and Proteomics DataR01CA194391 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN, MALLICK, BANI K · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Integrative methods for high-dimensional genomics dataR01CA160736 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160736NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inferring dependence structure through undirected graphs is crucial for uncovering the major modes of multivariate interaction among high-dimensional genomic markers that are potentially associated with cancer. Traditionally, conditional independence has been studied using sparse Gaussian graphical models for continuous data and sparse Ising models for discrete data. However, there are two clear situations when these approaches are inadequate. The first occurs when the data are continuous but display non-normal marginal behavior such as heavy tails or skewness, rendering an assumption of normality inappropriate. The second occurs when a part of the data is ordinal or discrete (e.g., presence or absence of a mutation) and the other part is continuous (e.g., expression levels of genes or proteins). In this case, the existing Bayesian approaches typically employ a latent variable framework for the discrete part that precludes inferring conditional independence among the data that are actually observed. The current article overcomes these two challenges in a unified framework using Gaussian scale mixtures. Our framework is able to handle continuous data that are not normal and data that are of mixed continuous and discrete nature, while still being able to infer a sparse conditional sign independence structure among the observed data. Extensive performance comparison in simulations with alternative techniques and an analysis of a real cancer genomics data set demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Indexed as

Statistical DistributionsBayes TheoremBiomarkers, TumorComputer GraphicsComputer SimulationGenomicsHumansLatent Class AnalysisNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBayesian methodsConditional sign independenceGenomic dataGraphical modelsMixed discrete and continuous dataScale mixtures

Identifiers

PMID28437848
PMCPMC5654714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.