Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28437543›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2017

Association of Donor Age and Sex With Survival of Patients Receiving Transfusions.

Gustaf Edgren, Henrik Ullum, Klaus Rostgaard, Christian Erikstrup, Ulrik Sartipy, Martin J Holzmann, Olof Nyrén, Henrik Hjalgrim

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06840756 (Effects of Donor-recipient Sex-matched Versus Sex-mismatched Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06840756 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Donor-recipient Sex-matched Versus Sex-mismatched Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMichelle ZellerRan2025 to 2029Enrolled11,082ConditionsRed Blood Cell Transfusions, Sex Differences, Health Services, Critically Ill Intensive Care Unit PatientsArmsSex-mismatched red blood cell transfusions, Sex-matched red blood cell transfusions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. It's in your blood: The impact of age, sex, genetic factors and exposures on stored red blood cell metabolism.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gustaf EdgrenDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden2Hematology Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik UllumDepartment of Clinical Immunology, the Blood Bank, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Klaus RostgaardDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian ErikstrupDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ulrik SartipySection of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden7Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin J HolzmannDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden9Department of Internal Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olof NyrénDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik HjalgrimDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark10Department of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karolinska Institutet · SEStatens Serum Institut · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKKarolinska University Hospital · SERigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Following animal model data indicating the possible rejuvenating effects of blood from young donors, there have been at least 2 observational studies conducted with humans that have investigated whether donor age affects patient outcomes. Results, however, have been conflicting. Objective: To study the association of donor age and sex with survival of patients receiving transfusions. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study based on the Scandinavian Donations and Transfusions database, with nationwide data, was conducted for all patients from Sweden and Denmark who received at least 1 red blood cell transfusion of autologous blood or blood from unknown donors between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2012. Patients were followed up from the first transfusion until death, emigration, or end of follow-up. Data analysis was performed from September 15 to November 15, 2016. Exposures: The number of transfusions from blood donors of different age and sex. Exposure was treated time dependently throughout follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratios (HRs) for death and adjusted cumulative mortality differences, both estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Results of a crude analysis including 968 264 transfusion recipients (550 257 women and 418 007 men; median age at first transfusion, 73.0 years [interquartile range, 59.8-82.4 years]) showed a U-shaped association between age of the blood donor and recipient mortality, with a nadir in recipients for the most common donor age group (40-49 years) and significant and increasing HRs among recipients of blood from donors of successively more extreme age groups (<20 years: HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.10-1.14; ≥70 years: HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.08-1.44). Higher mortality was also noted among recipients of blood from female donors (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.07-1.07). Adjustments for number of transfusions with a linear term attenuated the associations, but the increased mortality for recipients of blood from young, old, and female donors was not eliminated. Closer examination of the association between number of transfusions and mortality revealed a nonlinear pattern. After adjustments to accommodate nonlinearity, donor age and sex were no longer associated with patient mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: Donor age and sex were not associated with patient survival and need not be considered in blood allocation. Any comparison between common and less common categories of transfusions will inevitably be confounded by the number of transfusions, which drives the probability of receiving the less common blood components. Previous positive findings regarding donor age and sex are most likely explained by residual confounding.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBlood DonorsBlood TransfusionCohort StudiesDenmarkHumansMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisSurvivorsSweden

Identifiers

PMID28437543
PMCPMC5540056
OpenAlexW2608839461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.