Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28437539›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2017

Safety and Efficacy of Antiviral Therapy for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Immunocompetent Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nicholas J Cowley, Andrew Owen, Sarah C Shiels, Joanne Millar, Rebecca Woolley, Natalie Ives, Husam Osman, Paul Moss, Julian F Bion

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01503918 (Anti-viral Prophylaxis for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01503918 phase2completednot on this map

Anti-viral Prophylaxis for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation in Immunocompetent Patients in Critical Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustRan2012 to 2014Enrolled124ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsValaciclovir/Aciclovir, Valganciclovir/Ganciclovir
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Host-Microbe Multiomic Profiling Predicts Mortality in Sepsis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Viral reactivations and fungal infections in nonresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas J CowleyInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England2Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Worcester Royal Hospital, Worcestershire Acute National Health Service Trust, Worcester, England.
Andrew OwenInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England3University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England.
Sarah C ShielsUniversity Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England.
Joanne MillarUniversity Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England.
Rebecca WoolleyBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Natalie IvesBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Husam OsmanUniversity Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England.
Paul MossUniversity Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England5Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Julian F BionInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England3University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England.
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBNational Health Service · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1010-23225Medical Research Council G0901755Medical Research Council G1000622Medical Research Council MR/L017261/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Latent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is present in more than half the adult population, and a viral reactivation (ie, when the virus becomes measurable in body fluids such as blood) can occur in up to one-third of these individuals during episodes of critical illness. Objective: To determine whether antiviral therapy is safe and effective for preventing CMV reactivation in a general population of critically ill patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-center, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial recruited 124 CMV-seropositive patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours in the intensive care unit between January 1, 2012, and January 31, 2014. The mean baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of all patients was 17.6. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive anti-CMV prophylaxis with valacyclovir hydrochloride (n = 34) or low-dose valganciclovir hydrochloride (n = 46) for up to 28 days to suppress viral reactivation, or to a control group with no intervention (n = 44). Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to first CMV reactivation in blood within the 28-day follow-up period following initiation of the study drug. Results: Among the 124 patients in the study (46 women and 78 men; mean [SD] age, 56.9 [16.9] years), viral reactivation in the blood occurred in 12 patients in the control group, compared with 1 patient in the valganciclovir group and 2 patients in the valacyclovir group (combined treatment groups vs control: hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% CI 0.04-0.50). Although this trial was not powered to assess clinical end points, the valacyclovir arm was halted prematurely because of higher mortality; 14 of 34 patients (41.2%) had died by 28 days, compared with 5 of 37 (13.5%) patients in the control arm at the point of the decision to halt this arm. Other safety end points showed similar outcomes between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Antiviral prophylaxis with valacyclovir or low-dose valganciclovir suppresses CMV reactivation in patients with critical illness. However, given the higher mortality, a large-scale trial would be needed to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of CMV suppression. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01503918.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAcyclovirAdultAgedAntiviral AgentsCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpportunistic InfectionsRespiration, ArtificialValacyclovirValineAcyclovirAntiviral AgentsValacyclovirValine

Identifiers

PMID28437539
PMCPMC5818821
OpenAlexW2608873596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.