Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2017
Safety and Efficacy of Antiviral Therapy for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Immunocompetent Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01503918 (Anti-viral Prophylaxis for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Anti-viral Prophylaxis for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation in Immunocompetent Patients in Critical Care
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does treatment with antiviral medication affect mortality among immunocompetent individuals with cytomegalovirus reactivation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Viral Reactivation in Immunocompetent Critically Ill Patients.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- CMV and HHV-6 reactivation in immunocompetent patients hospitalised in the ICU - is it a real problem? A case series and narrative review.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2026Review
- Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- Histological proof of pulmonary herpesvirus presence in patients with COVID-19- or influenza-related ARDS.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Higher prevalence of cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in acute-on-chronic liver failure.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
- Associated Factors on Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Patients with COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Article
- The complexity of invasive fungal diseases in the intensive care unit: evaluation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Host-Microbe Multiomic Profiling Predicts Mortality in Sepsis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Current practices in the diagnosis and management of HSV and CMV reactivation in German ICUs: an exploratory web-based survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- CMV serostatus is associated with improved survival and delayed toxicity onset following anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Viral reactivations and fungal infections in nonresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Review
- Impact of prophylactic cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin on cytomegalovirus viremia and graft function in ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- What intensivists need to know about cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompromised ICU patients.Intensive care medicine · 2025Review
- RhCMV reactivation in SARS-CoV-2 infected aged rhesus macaques.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Active cytomegalovirus infection in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- CMV Retinitis in the Context of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Case Study and Comprehensive Review of Viral Interactions.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Cytomegalovirus end-organ disease in immunocompromised critically ill patients: key concerns demanding attention.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Latent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is present in more than half the adult population, and a viral reactivation (ie, when the virus becomes measurable in body fluids such as blood) can occur in up to one-third of these individuals during episodes of critical illness. Objective: To determine whether antiviral therapy is safe and effective for preventing CMV reactivation in a general population of critically ill patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-center, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial recruited 124 CMV-seropositive patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours in the intensive care unit between January 1, 2012, and January 31, 2014. The mean baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of all patients was 17.6. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive anti-CMV prophylaxis with valacyclovir hydrochloride (n = 34) or low-dose valganciclovir hydrochloride (n = 46) for up to 28 days to suppress viral reactivation, or to a control group with no intervention (n = 44). Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to first CMV reactivation in blood within the 28-day follow-up period following initiation of the study drug. Results: Among the 124 patients in the study (46 women and 78 men; mean [SD] age, 56.9 [16.9] years), viral reactivation in the blood occurred in 12 patients in the control group, compared with 1 patient in the valganciclovir group and 2 patients in the valacyclovir group (combined treatment groups vs control: hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% CI 0.04-0.50). Although this trial was not powered to assess clinical end points, the valacyclovir arm was halted prematurely because of higher mortality; 14 of 34 patients (41.2%) had died by 28 days, compared with 5 of 37 (13.5%) patients in the control arm at the point of the decision to halt this arm. Other safety end points showed similar outcomes between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Antiviral prophylaxis with valacyclovir or low-dose valganciclovir suppresses CMV reactivation in patients with critical illness. However, given the higher mortality, a large-scale trial would be needed to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of CMV suppression. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01503918.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.