Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28437527›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2017

Ocular Motor Nerve Development in the Presence and Absence of Extraocular Muscle.

Suzanne M Michalak, Mary C Whitman, Jong G Park, Max A Tischfield, Elaine H Nguyen, Elizabeth C Engle

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolution and development of extraocular motor neurons, nerves and muscles in vertebrates.Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Role of Apoptotic Signaling in Axon Guidance.Journal of developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suzanne M MichalakDepartment of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 2F. M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 3Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 4University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States 5Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States.
Mary C WhitmanF. M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 6Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 7Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Jong G ParkDepartment of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 2F. M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 3Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 5Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States 8Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Max A TischfieldF. M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 3Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Elaine H NguyenF. M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 6Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Elizabeth C EngleDepartment of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 2F. M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 3Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 5Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States 6Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 7Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

SYNAPTIC MECHANISMS IN HIPPOCAMPAL EPILEPTOGENESISP30HD018655 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI WOOLF, CLIFFORD J · 1985 to 2015
$26.2M
Mass Eye and Ear-Vision Clinical Scientist Development ProgramK12EY016335 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI Reza Dana · 2004 to 2026
$12.3M
Mouse Neurodevelopmental Behavior CoreU54HD090255 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAHIN, MUSTAFA · 2016 to 2020
$5.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS K12 EY016335NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD018655NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To spatially and temporally define ocular motor nerve development in the presence and absence of extraocular muscles (EOMs). Methods: Myf5cre mice, which in the homozygous state lack EOMs, were crossed to an IslMN:GFP reporter line to fluorescently label motor neuron cell bodies and axons. Embryonic day (E) 11.5 to E15.5 wild-type and Myf5cre/cre:IslMN:GFP whole mount embryos and dissected orbits were imaged by confocal microscopy to visualize the developing oculomotor, trochlear, and abducens nerves in the presence and absence of EOMs. E11.5 and E18.5 brainstems were serially sectioned and stained for Islet1 to determine the fate of ocular motor neurons. Results: At E11.5, all three ocular motor nerves in mutant embryos approached the orbit with a trajectory similar to that of wild-type. Subsequently, while wild-type nerves send terminal branches that contact target EOMs in a stereotypical pattern, the Myf5cre/cre ocular motor nerves failed to form terminal branches, regressed, and by E18.5 two-thirds of their corresponding motor neurons died. Comparisons between mutant and wild-type embryos revealed novel aspects of trochlear and oculomotor nerve development. Conclusions: We delineated mouse ocular motor nerve spatial and temporal development in unprecedented detail. Moreover, we found that EOMs are not necessary for initial outgrowth and guidance of ocular motor axons from the brainstem to the orbit but are required for their terminal branching and survival. These data suggest that intermediate targets in the mesenchyme provide cues necessary for appropriate targeting of ocular motor axons to the orbit, while EOM cues are responsible for terminal branching and motor neuron survival.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsEye MovementsMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, AnimalMotor NeuronsOculomotor MusclesOculomotor Nerve

Identifiers

PMID28437527
PMCPMC5403115
OpenAlexW2612874413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.