Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28437223›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurotrauma2017

Exercise and Peripheral Nerve Grafts as a Strategy To Promote Regeneration after Acute or Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.

Catherine C Theisen, Rahul Sachdeva, Scarlett Austin, Danielle Kulich, Victoria Kranz, John D Houle

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurotrauma, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brain Plasticity in Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Optic nerve regeneration: A long view.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine C Theisen1 Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel Spinal Cord Research Center, Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rahul Sachdeva2 University of British Columbia , Autonomic Research Laboratory, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada .
Scarlett Austin1 Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel Spinal Cord Research Center, Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Danielle Kulich1 Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel Spinal Cord Research Center, Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Victoria Kranz1 Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel Spinal Cord Research Center, Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
John D Houle1 Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel Spinal Cord Research Center, Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Drexel University · USInternational Collaboration On Repair Discoveries · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic interventions after spinal cord injury (SCI) routinely are designed to address multiple aspects of the primary and/or secondary damage that occurs. Exercise has a demonstrated efficacy for post-SCI complications such as cardiovascular dysfunction, neuropathic pain, and chronic inflammation, yet there is little understanding of the mechanisms by which improvements might result from this non-invasive approach. Here we review several of our observations of molecular and cellular changes within the injured spinal cord following acute or delayed exercise regimens that illustrate the potential for positive effects on neuroprotection and rehabilitation. Further, we provide new information about the role of exercise in promoting the regeneration of spinal axons into peripheral nerve grafts (PNGs) placed immediately or 6 weeks after injury. Acute and chronically injured propriospinal neurons within the lumbar spinal cord displayed the greatest propensity for enhanced regeneration after exercise, which correlates with the direct sensory input to this region from exercised hindlimb muscles. Future studies will extend these observations by testing whether exercise will boost the regenerative effort of axons to extend beyond the graft, interact with intraspinal targets, and establish functional connections across a lesion.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnimalsChronic DiseaseExercise TherapyHumansNerve RegenerationPeripheral NervesSpinal Cord InjuriesTransplantsexerciseregenerationtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID28437223
PMCPMC5444420
OpenAlexW2612731932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.