Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28436834›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2017

Active auditory experience in infancy promotes brain plasticity in Theta and Gamma oscillations.

Gabriella Musacchia, Silvia Ortiz-Mantilla, Naseem Choudhury, Teresa Realpe-Bonilla, Cynthia Roesler, April A Benasich

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mismatched response predicts behavioral speech discrimination outcomes in infants with hearing loss and normal hearing.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2021
    Article
  15. Critical period regulation across multiple timescales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Neuroplasticity in visual impairments.Neurology international · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriella MusacchiaCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, 197 University Ave., Newark, NJ 07102, United States. Electronic address: gmusacchia@pacific.edu.
Silvia Ortiz-MantillaCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, 197 University Ave., Newark, NJ 07102, United States.
Naseem ChoudhuryCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, 197 University Ave., Newark, NJ 07102, United States; School of Social Science and Human Services, Ramapo College of New Jersey, 505 Ramapo Valley Rd., Mahwah, NJ 07430, United States.
Teresa Realpe-BonillaCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, 197 University Ave., Newark, NJ 07102, United States.
Cynthia RoeslerCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, 197 University Ave., Newark, NJ 07102, United States.
April A BenasichCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, 197 University Ave., Newark, NJ 07102, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language acquisition in infants is driven by on-going neural plasticity that is acutely sensitive to environmental acoustic cues. Recent studies showed that attention-based experience with non-linguistic, temporally-modulated auditory stimuli sharpens cortical responses. A previous ERP study from this laboratory showed that interactive auditory experience via behavior-based feedback (AEx), over a 6-week period from 4- to 7-months-of-age, confers a processing advantage, compared to passive auditory exposure (PEx) or maturation alone (Naïve Control, NC). Here, we provide a follow-up investigation of the underlying neural oscillatory patterns in these three groups. In AEx infants, Standard stimuli with invariant frequency (STD) elicited greater Theta-band (4-6Hz) activity in Right Auditory Cortex (RAC), as compared to NC infants, and Deviant stimuli with rapid frequency change (DEV) elicited larger responses in Left Auditory Cortex (LAC). PEx and NC counterparts showed less-mature bilateral patterns. AEx infants also displayed stronger Gamma (33-37Hz) activity in the LAC during DEV discrimination, compared to NCs, while NC and PEx groups demonstrated bilateral activity in this band, if at all. This suggests that interactive acoustic experience with non-linguistic stimuli can promote a distinct, robust and precise cortical pattern during rapid auditory processing, perhaps reflecting mechanisms that support fine-tuning of early acoustic mapping.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansInfantMaleNeuronal PlasticityAuditoryBrain oscillationsDevelopmentEEGInfantPlasticity

Identifiers

PMID28436834
PMCPMC6987829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.