Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28436084›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2017

Defining "significant weight loss" in atypical anorexia nervosa.

K Jean Forney, Tiffany A Brown, Lauren A Holland-Carter, Grace A Kennedy, Pamela K Keel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Clinician Practices in Determining Expected Body Weights Across Eating Disorders: A Mixed Methods Study.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Thorny Issue of Atypical Anorexia Nervosa: Clinicians' Perspectives on How It Should Be Defined.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K Jean ForneyDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-8215-9335
Tiffany A BrownDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.ORCID 0000-0002-7349-7228
Lauren A Holland-CarterDivision of Bio-behavioral Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Grace A KennedyDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
Pamela K KeelDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
Florida State University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Longitudinal Follow-up of Purging Syndromes: Outcome and PredictorsF31MH105082 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FORNEY, KATHERINE JEAN · 2015 to 2017
$85k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH105082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAtypical anorexia nervosa (AAN) is defined by the symptoms of anorexia nervosa in the presence of "significant weight loss" in individuals who are not underweight. Description of current weight in AAN has been limited, significant weight loss has not been defined, and the distinction between having AAN versus having weight suppression has not been examined.

methodSecondary analyses were conducted with data from an epidemiological study of women (n = 1,640) and men (n = 794). Three definitions of significant weight loss (5, 10, and 15%) for AAN were tested in comparisons with controls and a DSM-5 eating disorder group (DSM-5 ED) on measures of eating pathology and clinical significance using ANCOVA and logistic regression, controlling for age and body mass index. Secondary analyses compared AAN to a weight suppressed group (WS-only) and a cognitive concerns group (COG-only).

resultsAcross weight loss thresholds, ≥25% of adults with AAN were currently overweight/obese. At the 5% and 10% definitions, AAN was associated with elevated eating pathology and distress relative to controls, WS-only, and COG-only in women and men. Women with AAN endorsed less eating pathology and distress than DSM-5 ED at some weight loss definitions, whereas men with AAN did not differ from DSM-5 ED in eating pathology or distress. DISCUSSION: Results support that even a 5% weight loss, combined with cognitive concerns, may produce a group with a clinically significant eating disorder. AAN was observed in both healthy weight and overweight/obese adults, highlighting the importance of screening for restrictive eating disorders at all weights.

Indexed as

AdultAnorexia NervosaBody WeightFemaleHumansMaleWeight LossYoung Adultatypical anorexia nervosabody image disturbanceother specified feeding or eating disorderperfectionismweight lossweight suppression

Identifiers

PMID28436084
PMCPMC12243440
OpenAlexW2607533914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.