Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28435986›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2017

Asian consortium on radiation dose of pediatric cardiac CT (ASCI-REDCARD).

Peter K T Hui, Hyun Woo Goo, Jing Du, Janice J K Ip, Suzu Kanzaki, Young Jin Kim, Supika Kritsaneepaiboon, Oktavia Lilyasari, Suvipaporn Siripornpitak

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recent Advances and Trends in Pediatric Cardiac Imaging.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Peter K T HuiDepartment of Radiology, Hong Kong Baptist Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Hyun Woo GooAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, South Korea. hwgoo@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6861-5958
Jing DuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Janice J K IpDepartment of Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Suzu KanzakiDepartment of Radiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Young Jin KimDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University, Shinchon Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Supika KritsaneepaiboonDepartment of Radiology, Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
Oktavia LilyasariDepartment of Cardiology, University of Indonesia, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Suvipaporn SiripornpitakDepartment of Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand.
Capital Medical University · CNHong Kong Baptist Hospital · HKMahidol University · THNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPPrince of Songkla University · THQueen Mary Hospital · CNUlsan College · KRUniversity of Indonesia · IDYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith incremental utilization of pediatric cardiac CT in congenital heart disease, it is imperative to define its current radiation dose levels in clinical practice in order to help imagers optimize CT protocols, particularly in Asia and other developing countries where CT physicists are not readily available.

objectiveTo evaluate current radiation dose levels and influencing factors in cardiac CT in children with congenital heart disease in Asia by conducting a retrospective multi-center, multi-vendor study. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included 1,043 pediatric cardiac CT examinations performed in 8 centers between January 2014 and December 2014 to evaluate congenital heart disease. In five weight groups, we calculated radiation dose metrics including volume CT dose index, size-specific dose estimate, dose-length product and effective dose. Age at CT exam, gender, tube voltage, scan mode, CT indication and image reconstruction algorithm were analyzed to learn whether they influenced CT radiation dose.

resultsVolume CT dose index, size-specific dose estimate, dose-length product and effective dose of pediatric cardiac CT showed variations in the range of 4.3-23.8 mGy, 4.9-17.6 mGy, 55.8-501.3 mGy∙cm and 1.5-3.2 mSv, respectively, within five weight groups. Gender, tube voltage, scan mode and cardiac function assessment significantly influenced CT radiation dose.

conclusionThis multi-center, multi-vendor study demonstrated variations in radiation dose metrics of pediatric cardiac CT reflecting current practice in Asia. Gender, tube voltage, scan mode and cardiac function assessment should be considered as essential radiation dose-influencing factors in developing optimal pediatric cardiac CT protocols.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAsiaChildChild, PreschoolConsensusHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRetrospective StudiesChildrenComputed tomographyCongenital heart diseaseMulti-center studyRadiation dose

Identifiers

PMID28435986
OpenAlexW2605858552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.