Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28435816›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of public health2017

A Risk Assessment Comparison of Breast Cancer and Factors Affected to Risk Perception of Women in Turkey: A Cross-sectional Study.

Serpil Yüksel, Gülay Altun Uğraş, İkbal Çavdar, Atilla Bozdoğan, Sibel Özkan Gürdal, Neriman Akyolcu, Ecem Esencan, Gamze Varol Saraçoğlu, Vahit Özmen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bayesian Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling of Breast Cancer.Iranian journal of public health · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Serpil YükselDept. of Surgical Nursing, Division of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Gülay Altun UğraşDept. of Surgical Nursing, Division of Nursing, School of Health, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
İkbal ÇavdarDept. of Surgical Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Atilla BozdoğanDept. of General Surgery, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Sibel Özkan GürdalDept. of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey.
Neriman AkyolcuDept. of Surgical Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ecem EsencanSchool of Medicine, Koç University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Gamze Varol SaraçoğluDept. of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey.
Vahit ÖzmenDept. of General Surgery, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TRKoç University · TRNamık Kemal University · TRNecmettin Erbakan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increase in breast cancer incidence has enhanced attention towards breast cancer risk. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of breast cancer and risk perception of women, factors that affect risk perception, and to determine differences between absolute risk and the perception of risk.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was carried out among 346 women whose score in the Gail Risk Model (GRM) was ≥ 1.67% and/or had a 1

resultsEven though 39.6% of the women considered themselves as high-risk carriers, according to the GRM and the BCRAF, only 11.6% and 9.8% of women were in the "high risk" category, respectively. There was a positive significant correlation between the GRM and the BCRAF scores (

conclusionIn women with high risk of breast, cancer there is a significant difference between the women's risk perception and their absolute risk level.

Indexed as

Breast cancerGail risk modelRisk factorsRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID28435816
PMCPMC5395526
OpenAlexW2602475078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.