Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28435809›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2015

Polyana Kelly Martins, Thiago Jonas Nakayama, Ana Paula Ribeiro, Bárbara Andrade Dias Brito da Cunha, Alexandre Lima Nepomuceno, Frank G Harmon, Adilson Kenji Kobayashi, Hugo Bruno Correa Molinari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. TheFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  6. Multi-omics intervention inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Plant science's next top models.Annals of botany · 2020
    Review
  10. Robust and ReproducibleFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Status ofFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Polyana Kelly MartinsGenetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Embrapa Agroenergy, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Thiago Jonas NakayamaFederal University of Viçosa (UFLA), Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Ana Paula RibeiroGenetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Embrapa Agroenergy, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Bárbara Andrade Dias Brito da CunhaGenetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Embrapa Agroenergy, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Alexandre Lima NepomucenoPlant Biotechnology Laboratory, Embrapa Soybean, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Frank G HarmonPlant Gene Expression Center, USDA-ARS, Albany, CA 94710, USA.
Adilson Kenji KobayashiGenetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Embrapa Agroenergy, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Hugo Bruno Correa MolinariGenetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Embrapa Agroenergy, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Green milletModel plantRed fluorescent protein

Identifiers

PMID28435809
PMCPMC5374283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.