Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28435785›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2017

Impact of a brief intervention on cervical health literacy: A waitlist control study with jailed women.

Megha Ramaswamy, Jaehoon Lee, Joi Wickliffe, Molly Allison, Amanda Emerson, Patricia J Kelly

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02128659 nacompletednot on this map

Sexual Health Empowerment for Cervical Health Literacy and Cancer Prevention

TypeinterventionalSponsorMegha Ramaswamy, PhD, MPHRan2014 to 2019Enrolled261ConditionsCervical CancerArmsSHE Project
NCT03984695 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Sexual Health Empowerment for Jail-Involved Women's Health Literacy and Prevention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2019 to 2026Enrolled279ConditionsCervical Cancer, Breast Cancer, Contraceptive Usage, Sexually Transmitted DiseasesArmsSHE-WOMEN
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developing a Cancer Prevention Health Education Resource: a Primer of Process and Evaluation.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Getting started in jail, prison, and legal system research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Abnormal Pap Follow-Up among Criminal-Legal Involved Women in Three U.S. Cities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megha RamaswamyPreventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Jaehoon LeeCollege of Education, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Joi WickliffePreventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Molly AllisonPreventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Amanda EmersonSchool of Nursing, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Patricia J KellySchool of Nursing, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.

Funding

Sexual Health Empowerment (SHE) for Cervical Health Literacy and Cancer Prevention Diversity SupplementR01CA181047 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WICKLIFFE, JOI · 2014 to 2023
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Jailed women are four-five times more likely to have had cervical cancer compared to women without criminal justice histories. Previous research has shown that an important contributor to cervical cancer risk, and perhaps lack of follow-up, is incarcerated women's low health literacy about broader reproductive health issues. Little work has been done to address this disparity. Thus, the objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of an intervention to improve incarcerated women's cervical health literacy and ultimately address cervical cancer disparities. Using a waitlist control design, we compared changes in cervical health literacy (knowledge, beliefs, self-efficacy, and confidence for screening and follow-up) among 188 incarcerated women who completed a 10-hour intervention between 2014 and 2016 in three Kansas City jails. We used bivariate tests and multivariate analyses that controlled for baseline cervical health literacy level and key covariates. Women in the intervention group showed significant gains in seven out of eight cervical health literacy domains (all p < 0.01), whereas the control group only improved in one domain (p < 0.01). When controlling for covariates, the intervention group had less barriers, perceptions of seriousness, susceptibility to disease, and increased self-efficacy for cervical health screening and follow-up, compared to the control group (all p < 0.05). A brief intervention is an effective way to improve jailed women's cervical health literacy, but should be provided alongside systemic efforts that expand access to correctional preventive health services, including the human papillomavirus vaccine, community-based cancer screenings, and health insurance after women leave jails and transition back to communities.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerCervical health literacyHealth literacyJailsWomen's health

Identifiers

PMID28435785
PMCPMC5393169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.