ArticleClinical & translational immunology2017
Screening for immune response against Dengue virus in Vietnamese non-human primates: implications for vaccine developers.
Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The tetravalent formulation of domain III-capsid proteins recalls memory B- and T-cell responses induced in monkeys by an experimental dengue virus infection.Clinical & translational immunology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the major problems faced for the development of a vaccine against Dengue virus is the lack of a suitable animal model. Although non-human primates do not show overt signs of disease, these animals develop viremia after the infection and are the best model to evaluate vaccine candidates against this pathogen. However, for that purpose, the screening of all animals is mandatory to discard those with previous natural immunity. The most common technique used in the screening is the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). However, most recent studies points to the cell-mediated immunity (CMI) as an important player in the process of controlling Dengue virus (DENV) infections. Here we presented the results from the screening of 55 rhesus monkeys housed in an animal breeding facility at Quang Ninh province, Vietnam. We evaluated the neutralizing antibody response by PRNT and determined the levels of interferon γ (IFNγ)-secretion after the viral stimulation of monkey-peripheral blood mononuclear cells, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We found no correspondence between PRNT and IFNγ-ELISA. In fact, 19 animals were positive only by IFNγ-ELISA. Moreover, to study the protective capacity of the CMI detected, three animals with positive response by IFNγ-ELISA and negative by PRNT were inoculated with an infective preparation of DENV-3 and, as a result, no viremia was detected during 10 days after the challenge. This fact points to the importance of screening non-human primates through a CMI assay together with PRNT. This procedure should discard those false-negative cases which would be protected after the viral challenge in the immunization schedule.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.