ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2016
Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures.
Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for intertrochanteric femur fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes following long versus short cephalomedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of a twin interlocking derotation and compression screw cephalomedullary nail (InterTAN) with a single screw derotation cephalomedullary nail (proximal femoral nail antirotation): a systematic review and meta-analysis for intertrochanteric fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2018Pooled it
- Treating Intertrochanteric Fracture by Short and Long Cephalomedullary Nail: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Trochanteric hip fractures with subtrochanteric extension. Does the cephalomedullary nail length matter?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of Outcomes of Long Versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails for the Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 14,547 Patients.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Article
- Clinical and radiological results of using proximal femoral locking compression plate and proximal femoral nail antirotation for subtrochanteric fractures.European journal of translational myology · 2022Article
- Early Clinical Outcomes of Short versus Long Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (PFNA) in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2021Article
- Short or long intramedullary devices for hip fracture? A systematic review of the evidence.Journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.