ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2017
Agreement Between Serum Assays Performed in ED Point-of-Care and Hospital Central Laboratories.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-enabled electrocardiogram alert for potassium imbalance treatment: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Sustainability of Blood Pressure Reduction in Black Barbershops.Circulation · 2019Trial
- A Cluster-Randomized Trial of Blood-Pressure Reduction in Black Barbershops.The New England journal of medicine · 2018Trial
- Agreement between serum creatinine and fingerstick creatinine measurements in adult patients admitted to the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Application and comparison of point-of-care devices for field evaluation of underlying health status of Guatemalan sugarcane workers.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- [Cardiac arrest under special circumstances].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
- Acute hyperkalemia in the emergency department: a summary from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes conference.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2020Review
- Unadjusted point of care creatinine results overestimate acute kidney injury incidence during field testing in Guatemala.PloS one · 2018Article
- Acute hyperkalemia in adults.Turkish journal of emergency medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPoint-of-care (POC) testing allows for more time-sensitive diagnosis and treatment in the emergency department (ED) than sending blood samples to the hospital central laboratory (CL). However, many ED patients have blood sent to both, either out of clinical custom, or because clinicians do not trust the POC values. The objective of this study was to examine the level of agreement between POC and CL values in a large cohort of ED patients.
methodsIn an urban, Level I ED that sees approximately 120,000 patients/year, all patients seen between March 1, 2013, and October 1, 2014, who had blood sent to POC and CL labs had levels of agreement measured between serum sodium, potassium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, and hematocrit. We extracted data from the hospital's clinical information system, and analyzed agreement with the use of Bland-Altman plots, defining both 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and more conservative CIs based on clinical judgment.
resultsOut of 163,661 patients seen during the study period, 14,567 had blood samples sent both for POC and CL analysis. Using clinical criteria, the levels of agreement for sodium were 98.6% (within 5mg/dL), for potassium 90.7% (0.5 mmol/L), for BUN 89.0% (within 5 mg/dL), for creatinine 94.5% (within 0.3 mg/dL), for hematocrit 96.5% (within 5 g/dL).
conclusionAgreement between POC and CL values is excellent. Restricting the analysis to clinically important levels of agreement continues to show a high level of agreement. The data suggest that sending a serum sample to the hospital CL for duplicate assays is unnecessary. This may result in substantial savings and shorter ED lengths of stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.