ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2017
Accelerometer- versus questionnaire-based assessment of physical activity and their changes over time in patients with COPD.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Objective Measurement of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Points to Keep in Mind during Evaluations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Identification of hip fracture patients at risk for postoperative mobilisation complications via handgrip strength assessment.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- Discriminant Validity of a Single Clinical Question for the Screening of Inactivity in Individuals Living with COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022Article
- Self-Assessment of Mobility of People over 65 Years of Age.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- A cross-sectional analysis of physical activity and weight misreporting in diverse populations: The Seattle Obesity Study III.Obesity science & practice · 2020Article
- Data Reproducibility and Effectiveness of Bronchodilators for Improving Physical Activity in COPD Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Selecting, Administering, and Interpreting Outcome Measures among Adults with Lower-Limb Loss: An Update for Clinicians.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2020Article
- Translation and Cultural Adaptation of PROactive Instruments for COPD in French and Influence of Weather and Pollution on Its Difficulty Score.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Article
- Device-Assessed Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors in Canadians with Chronic Disease(s): Findings from the Canadian Health Measures Survey.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- "Can do" versus "do do": A Novel Concept to Better Understand Physical Functioning in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Improvement In Self-Reported Physical Functioning With Tiotropium/Olodaterol In Central And Eastern European COPD Patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019Observational
- Validity of accelerometry in step detection and gait speed measurement in orthogeriatric patients.PloS one · 2019Article
- Continuous remote monitoring of COPD patients-justification and explanation of the requirements and a survey of the available technologies.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2018Review
- A Feasibility Study for Teaching Older Kidney Transplant Recipients How to Wear and Use an Activity Tracker to Promote Daily Physical Activity.Nephrology nursing journal : journal of the American Nephrology Nurses' AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivePhysical activity (PA) is an important outcome parameter in patients with COPD regarding hospitalizations and mortality. Both objective assessment by accelerometers and self-evaluation by questionnaires were used in studies investigating PA in COPD. Whether self-reported questionnaires can adequately reflect PA and its changes over time compared to objective assessments has not been thoroughly investigated in COPD. In this COPD cohort study, we evaluated whether PA measured by accelerometer and its annual changes can also be assessed by self-reported questionnaires.
methodsIn 178 COPD patients with at least two assessments of PA, the agreement between objectively measured and self-reported activity was analyzed by Bland-Altman plots. Daily PA was assessed by a triaxial activity monitor over 1 week and by the self-reported German PA questionnaire 50+.
resultsComparison between the two methods of measurement revealed no convincing agreement with a mean difference and limits of agreement (±1.96 standard deviation [SD]) of time spent in at least moderate PA (>3 metabolic equivalent of task [MET]) of -77.6 (-340.3/185.2) min/day, indicating a self-reported overestimation of PA by the questionnaire. The mean difference and limits of agreement (±1.96SD) in the annual change of PA was 1.2 min/day (-208.2/282.6 min/day), showing also a poor agreement on an individual level.
conclusionEvaluation of objectively measured and self-reported PA and their annual changes revealed no agreement in patients with COPD. Therefore, the evaluated questionnaire seems not helpful for measurement of PA and its changes over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.