Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28435015›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2017

Using classification models for the generation of disease-specific medications from biomedical literature and clinical data repository.

Liqin Wang, Peter J Haug, Guilherme Del Fiol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liqin WangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA; Homer Warner Research Center, Intermountain Healthcare, 5121 South Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT 84107, USA. Electronic address: liqin.wang@utah.edu.
Peter J HaugDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA; Homer Warner Research Center, Intermountain Healthcare, 5121 South Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT 84107, USA.
Guilherme Del FiolDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.

Funding

Meeting Clinicians' Information Needs with Highly Tailored Knowledge SummariesR01LM011416 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DEL FIOL, GUILHERME · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
Building Complex Disease Models using Ontologies and Data RepositoriesRC1LM010482 · NLM · IHC HEALTH SERVICES, INC. · PI HAUG, PETER JOHN · 2010 to 2010
$758k
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011416NLM NIH HHS RC1 LM010482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMining disease-specific associations from existing knowledge resources can be useful for building disease-specific ontologies and supporting knowledge-based applications. Many association mining techniques have been exploited. However, the challenge remains when those extracted associations contained much noise. It is unreliable to determine the relevance of the association by simply setting up arbitrary cut-off points on multiple scores of relevance; and it would be expensive to ask human experts to manually review a large number of associations. We propose that machine-learning-based classification can be used to separate the signal from the noise, and to provide a feasible approach to create and maintain disease-specific vocabularies.

methodWe initially focused on disease-medication associations for the purpose of simplicity. For a disease of interest, we extracted potentially treatment-related drug concepts from biomedical literature citations and from a local clinical data repository. Each concept was associated with multiple measures of relevance (i.e., features) such as frequency of occurrence. For the machine purpose of learning, we formed nine datasets for three diseases with each disease having two single-source datasets and one from the combination of previous two datasets. All the datasets were labeled using existing reference standards. Thereafter, we conducted two experiments: (1) to test if adding features from the clinical data repository would improve the performance of classification achieved using features from the biomedical literature only, and (2) to determine if classifier(s) trained with known medication-disease data sets would be generalizable to new disease(s).

resultsSimple logistic regression and LogitBoost were two classifiers identified as the preferred models separately for the biomedical-literature datasets and combined datasets. The performance of the classification using combined features provided significant improvement beyond that using biomedical-literature features alone (p-value<0.001). The performance of the classifier built from known diseases to predict associated concepts for new diseases showed no significant difference from the performance of the classifier built and tested using the new disease's dataset.

conclusionIt is feasible to use classification approaches to automatically predict the relevance of a concept to a disease of interest. It is useful to combine features from disparate sources for the task of classification. Classifiers built from known diseases were generalizable to new diseases.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesData MiningMachine LearningPeriodicals as TopicDatabases as TopicDiseaseHumansPublicationsBiomedical literatureClassificationClinical data repositoryDisease-specific vocabularyMachine learningOntology

Identifiers

PMID28435015
PMCPMC5509335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.